Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 71
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-147 (2026)

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

71-147.

Transferred to section 38-178.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1969–2021 · leading case: Mahnke v. State, Dept. of Health, 751 N.W.2d 635 (Neb. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Mahnke v. State, Dept. of Health, 751 N.W.2d 635 (Neb. 2008). · cites it 30× “At all relevant times, the provisions in §§ 71-147 and 71-148 appeared in the Uniform Licensing Law in chapter 71 of the Nebraska Revised Statutes.”
Davis v. Wright, 503 N.W.2d 814 (Neb. 1993). · cites it 15× “Spire as Attorney General of the State of Nebraska under the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-147 et seq. (Reissue 1990) against Davis, .”
Poor v. State, 663 N.W.2d 109 (Neb. 2003). · cites it 15× “1998), of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, and was a ground for discipline under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-147 (17) (Cum. Supp.”
Langvardt v. Horton, 581 N.W.2d 60 (Neb. 1998). · cites it 8× “, in diagnosing and treating a young patient rose to the level of gross incompetence in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-147 (5)(d) (Reissue 1990).”
Curry v. State Ex Rel. Stenberg, 496 N.W.2d 512 (Neb. 1993). · cites it 16× “The director found that Curry had engaged in unprofessional conduct, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-147 (10) (Reissue 1990), and as a consequence restricted his medical practice in a variety of respects for a period of 1 year, required him to take additional training, and…”
Styskal v. Wright, 519 N.W.2d 543 (Neb. 1994). · cites it 12× “The petition alleged that Styskal had engaged in grossly immoral, dishonorable conduct showing a lack of *514 fitness to practice dentistry in Nebraska, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-147 (2) (Reissue 1990); that Styskal had practiced dentistry beyond its authorized scope,…”
State v. Wolf, 549 N.W.2d 183 (Neb. 1996). · cites it 4× “The petition stated that Wolf’s actions constituted grounds for disciplinary action pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-147 (17) (Cum. Supp.”
Med. Prot. Co. v. Schrein, 582 N.W.2d 286 (Neb. 1998). · cites it 3× “On January 8, 1991, the Department of Health found that Schrein had committed grossly immoral and dishonorable conduct, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-147 (2) (Reissue 1990), and unprofessional conduct, in violation of § 71-147(10), and revoked Schrein’s license to…”
Sedivy v. State Ex Rel. Stenberg, 567 N.W.2d 784 (Neb. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 5× “Thereafter, the Department of Health revoked Sedivy’s veterinary medicine license in 1994 under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-147 (4) (Reissue 1996) (misdemeanor or felony conviction rationally related to licensee’s fitness to practice).”
Kloch v. Kohl, 545 F.3d 603 (8th Cir. 2008). “See Neb.Rev.Stat. § 71-147; see also Iowa Code § 148.”
Parker v. State Ex Rel. Bruning, 753 N.W.2d 843 (Neb. 2008). · cites it 6× “The State alleged that Parker's act of allowing Braun to use the rubber stamp to issue prescriptions justified discipline under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-147 (8) (Reissue 2003).”
Whittle v. State, 309 Neb. 695 (Neb. 2021). · cites it 2× “The problem with the regulation as it was written at the time Mahnke was under consideration was that it cre- ated a basis to discipline a professional who had committed a single act of unprofessional conduct and therefore directly contradicted the language of the enabling…”
Show all 17 citing cases →
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-147(10) — 6 cases
Davis v. Wright, 503 N.W.2d 814 (Neb. 1993). “Spire as Attorney General of the State of Nebraska under the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-147 et seq. (Reissue 1990) against Davis, .”
Mahnke v. State, Dept. of Health, 751 N.W.2d 635 (Neb. 2008). “At all relevant times, the provisions in §§ 71-147 and 71-148 appeared in the Uniform Licensing Law in chapter 71 of the Nebraska Revised Statutes.”
Curry v. State Ex Rel. Stenberg, 496 N.W.2d 512 (Neb. 1993). “The director found that Curry had engaged in unprofessional conduct, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-147 (10) (Reissue 1990), and as a consequence restricted his medical practice in a variety of respects for a period of 1 year, required him to take additional training, and…”
Med. Prot. Co. v. Schrein, 582 N.W.2d 286 (Neb. 1998). “On January 8, 1991, the Department of Health found that Schrein had committed grossly immoral and dishonorable conduct, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-147 (2) (Reissue 1990), and unprofessional conduct, in violation of § 71-147(10), and revoked Schrein’s license to…”
Styskal v. Wright, 519 N.W.2d 543 (Neb. 1994). “The petition alleged that Styskal had engaged in grossly immoral, dishonorable conduct showing a lack of *514 fitness to practice dentistry in Nebraska, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-147 (2) (Reissue 1990); that Styskal had practiced dentistry beyond its authorized scope,…”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-147(17) — 1 case
State v. Wolf, 549 N.W.2d 183 (Neb. 1996). “The petition stated that Wolf’s actions constituted grounds for disciplinary action pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-147 (17) (Cum. Supp.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-147(2) — 5 cases
Davis v. Wright, 503 N.W.2d 814 (Neb. 1993). “Spire as Attorney General of the State of Nebraska under the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-147 et seq. (Reissue 1990) against Davis, .”
Poor v. State, 663 N.W.2d 109 (Neb. 2003). “1998), of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, and was a ground for discipline under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-147 (17) (Cum. Supp.”
Styskal v. Wright, 519 N.W.2d 543 (Neb. 1994). “The petition alleged that Styskal had engaged in grossly immoral, dishonorable conduct showing a lack of *514 fitness to practice dentistry in Nebraska, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-147 (2) (Reissue 1990); that Styskal had practiced dentistry beyond its authorized scope,…”
Sedivy v. State Ex Rel. Stenberg, 567 N.W.2d 784 (Neb. Ct. App. 1997). “Thereafter, the Department of Health revoked Sedivy’s veterinary medicine license in 1994 under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-147 (4) (Reissue 1996) (misdemeanor or felony conviction rationally related to licensee’s fitness to practice).”
Parker v. State Ex Rel. Bruning, 753 N.W.2d 843 (Neb. 2008). “The State alleged that Parker's act of allowing Braun to use the rubber stamp to issue prescriptions justified discipline under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-147 (8) (Reissue 2003).”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-147(4) — 2 cases
Poor v. State, 663 N.W.2d 109 (Neb. 2003). “1998), of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, and was a ground for discipline under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-147 (17) (Cum. Supp.”
Sedivy v. State Ex Rel. Stenberg, 567 N.W.2d 784 (Neb. Ct. App. 1997). “Thereafter, the Department of Health revoked Sedivy’s veterinary medicine license in 1994 under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-147 (4) (Reissue 1996) (misdemeanor or felony conviction rationally related to licensee’s fitness to practice).”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-147(5) — 1 case
Mahnke v. State, Dept. of Health, 751 N.W.2d 635 (Neb. 2008). “At all relevant times, the provisions in §§ 71-147 and 71-148 appeared in the Uniform Licensing Law in chapter 71 of the Nebraska Revised Statutes.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-147(5)(b) — 2 cases
Davis v. Wright, 503 N.W.2d 814 (Neb. 1993). “Spire as Attorney General of the State of Nebraska under the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-147 et seq. (Reissue 1990) against Davis, .”
Styskal v. Wright, 519 N.W.2d 543 (Neb. 1994). “The petition alleged that Styskal had engaged in grossly immoral, dishonorable conduct showing a lack of *514 fitness to practice dentistry in Nebraska, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-147 (2) (Reissue 1990); that Styskal had practiced dentistry beyond its authorized scope,…”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-147(5)(d) — 1 case
Langvardt v. Horton, 581 N.W.2d 60 (Neb. 1998). “, in diagnosing and treating a young patient rose to the level of gross incompetence in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-147 (5)(d) (Reissue 1990).”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-147(5)(e) — 1 case
Mahnke v. State, Dept. of Health, 751 N.W.2d 635 (Neb. 2008). “At all relevant times, the provisions in §§ 71-147 and 71-148 appeared in the Uniform Licensing Law in chapter 71 of the Nebraska Revised Statutes.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-147(8) — 1 case
Parker v. State Ex Rel. Bruning, 753 N.W.2d 843 (Neb. 2008). “The State alleged that Parker's act of allowing Braun to use the rubber stamp to issue prescriptions justified discipline under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-147 (8) (Reissue 2003).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.