Nebraska Revised Statutes
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 76-299 (2026)
Reverter or rights of entry for breach of condition subsequent; not alienable or devisable
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Possibilities of reverter or rights of entry or reentry for breach of condition subsequent are hereby declared to be future interests and shall not be alienable or devisable; and no conveyance thereof made after May 15, 1959, shall operate in favor of the grantee or persons claiming under such grantee.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1965–1986 · leading case: Bode v. Flobert Indus., Inc., 249 N.W.2d 750 (Neb. 1977).
Bode v. Flobert Indus., Inc., 249 N.W.2d 750 (Neb. 1977). “" The right-of-way through both the Hoefer and Bode properties was conveyed to the defendant Flobert Industries, Inc., by the railroad company. If the original conveyance of the right-of-way across the Hoefer land is a deed in fee simple determinable or conditional, the Hoefer…”
Cast v. Nat'l Bank of Com. T. & S. Ass'n of Lincoln, 183 N.W.2d 485 (Neb. 1971). “Sections 76-299, 76-2,100, 76-2,101, and 76-2,102, R.”
Abboud v. Lakeview, Inc., 391 N.W.2d 575 (Neb. 1986). “” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 76-299 (Reissue 1981) specifically provides that “rights of entry or reentry for breach of condition subsequent are .”
Cast v. Nat'l Bank of Com. Trust & S. Ass'n, 176 N.W.2d 29 (Neb. 1970). “Plaintiff calls attention to section 76-299, R.R.S.1943, which provides that the possibilities of a reverter or right of entry for breach of condition subsequent are not alienable or devisable.”
Cast v. Nat'l Bank of Com. Trust & Sav. Ass'n, 183 N.W.2d 485 (Neb. 1971). “Sections 76-299, 76-2,100, 76-2,101, and 76-2,102, R.”
McArdle v. Sch. Dist. of Omaha, 136 N.W.2d 422 (Neb. 1965). “It further held that the provisions of the act regarding alienation of future interest, Laws 1959, chapter 350, page 1237, now sections 76-299 to 76-2,105, R. S. Supp., 1963, were constitutional and prevented reverter or a judgment for the plaintiffs.”
Cast v. Nat'l Bank of Com. Trust & Sav. Ass'n, 176 N.W.2d 29 (Neb. 1970). “Plaintiff calls attention to section 76-299, R. R. S. 1943, which provides that the possibilities of a reverter or right of entry for breach *369 of condition subsequent are not alienable or devisable.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.