(1)
Unless the county has adopted a resolution to extend the deadline for hearing
protests under section 77-1502, after completion of its actions and based
upon the hearings conducted pursuant to sections 77-1502 and 77-1504, a county
board of equalization may petition the Tax Equalization and Review Commission
to consider an adjustment to a class or subclass of real property within the
county. Petitions must be filed with the commission on or before July 26.
(2) The commission shall hear and take action on a petition
filed by a county board of equalization on or before August 10. Hearings held
pursuant to this section may be held by means of videoconference or telephone conference.
The burden of proof is on the petitioning county to show that failure to make
an adjustment would result in values that are not equitable and in accordance
with the law. At the hearing the commission may receive testimony from any
interested person.
(3) After a hearing the commission shall, within the powers
granted in section 77-5023, enter its order based on evidence presented to
it at such hearing and the hearings held pursuant to section 77-5022 for that
year. The order shall specify the percentage increase or decrease and the
class or subclass of real property affected or any corrections or adjustments
to be made to the class or subclass of real property affected. When issuing
an order to adjust a class or subclass of real property, the commission may
exclude individual properties from that order whose value has already been
adjusted by a county board of equalization in the same manner as the commission
directs in its order. On or before August 10 of each year, the commission
shall send its order by certified mail to the county assessor and by regular
mail to the county clerk and chairperson of the county board.
(4) The county assessor shall make the specified changes
to each item of property in the county as directed by the order of the commission.
In implementing such order, the county assessor shall adjust the values of
the class or subclass that is the subject of the order. For properties that
have already received an adjustment from the county board of equalization,
an additional adjustment may be made so that total adjustments made are equal
to the commission's ordered adjustment and no additional adjustment shall
be made applying the commission's order, but such an exclusion from the commission's
order shall not preclude adjustments to those properties for corrections or
omissions. The county assessor of the county adjusted by an order of the commission
shall recertify the abstract of assessment to the Property Tax Administrator
on or before August 20.
Notes of Decisions
Cnty. of Douglas v. Nebraska Tax Equalization & Review Comm'n, 635 N.W.2d 413 (Neb. 2001).
· cites it 2× “At the hearing, [TERC] may receive testimony from any interested person. State law also provides that “[a]ny party aggrieved by a final decision in a case appealed to [TERC] and any county or other political subdivision aggrieved by an order of [TERC] issued pursuant to section…”
Marshall v. Dawes Cnty. Bd. of Equalization, 654 N.W.2d 184 (Neb. 2002).
· cites it 12× “The board filed its own petition with TERC pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 77-1504.01 (Cum. Supp. 1998), asking TERC to issue a stay or reverse TERC’s order of May 14.”
Widtfeldt v. Holt Cnty. Bd. of Equalization, 677 N.W.2d 521 (Neb. Ct. App. 2004).
· cites it 2× “” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 77-1504.01 (Reissue 2003) concerns petitions to the Commission by a county board of equalization to consider an adjustment to a class or subclass of real property within the county.”
Perkins Cty. Bd. of Equal. v. Mid Am. Agri Prods., 317 Neb. 1 (Neb. 2024).
· cites it 2× “” The mandatory requirements for instituting such review are set out in the next subsection, which provides in relevant part: (2)(a) Proceedings for review shall be instituted by fil- ing a petition and the appropriate docket fees in the Court of Appeals: (i) Within thirty days…”
Bartlett v. Dawes Cnty. Bd. of Equalization, 613 N.W.2d 810 (Neb. 2000).
· cites it 3× “In August 1998, the board filed its own petition with TERC pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 77-1504.01 (Cum. Supp. 1998), which allows a county board to petition TERC to consider an adjustment to a class or subclass of property.”
Boone Cty. Bd. v. Tax Equal. & Rev. Com'n, 611 N.W.2d 119 (Neb. Ct. App. 2000).
· cites it 23× “On July 22, 1999, the Boone County Board then filed a petition with the commission pursuant to Neb.Rev.Stat. § 77-1504.01 (Supp.1999). Section 77-1504.”
Marshall v. Dawes Cnty. Bd. of Equal., 654 N.W.2d 184 (Neb. 2002).
· cites it 12× “*187 The board filed its own petition with TERC pursuant to Neb.Rev.Stat. § 77-1504.01 (Cum.Supp.1998), asking TERC to issue a stay or reverse TERC's order of May 14.”
Widtfeldt v. Holt Cnty. Bd. of Equal., 677 N.W.2d 521 (Neb. Ct. App. 2004).
· cites it 2× “" Neb. Rev.Stat. § 77-1504.01 (Reissue 2003) concerns petitions to the Commission by a county board of equalization to consider an adjustment to a class or subclass of real property within the county.”
Bartlett v. Dawes Cnty. Bd. of Equal., 613 N.W.2d 810 (Neb. 2000).
· cites it 3× “In August 1998, the board filed its own petition with TERC pursuant to Neb.Rev. Stat. § 77-1504.01 (Cum.Supp.1998), which allows a county board to petition TERC to consider an adjustment to a class or subclass of property.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.