Neb. Rev. Stat. § 77-506
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
77-506.
Transferred to section 77-5023.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases, 1946–1996 · leading case: AT & T Information System, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment
AT & T Information System, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment (1991)
“) Section 77-506 provides that pursuant to § 77-505, the State Board “shall have the power to increase or decrease the actual valuation of a class or subclass of real or personal property of any county or tax district.”
Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. State Board of Equalization (1991)
“See Neb.Rev.Stat. § 77-506 (Reissue 1990). A.”
Fromkin v. State (1954)
“Under the provisions of section 77-506, R. R. S. 1943, the state board is given the broad “power to increase or decrease the assessed-valuation of real or personal property of any county or tax district” for the purpose of equalizing assessments so as to make the same conform…”
Laflin v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment (1953)
“Section 77-506, R. R. S. 1943, states in part: “The State Board of Equalization and Assessment shall proceed to examine the abstracts of real and personal property assessed for taxation in the several counties of the state, including the railroads and pipe lines entirely within…”
County of Howard v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment (1954)
“Section 77-506, R. R. S. 1943, provides that the State Board shall proceed to examine the abstracts of real and personal property assessed for taxation in the several counties of the state, and shall equalize such assessment so as to make the same conform to law.”
John Day Co. v. Douglas County Board of Equalization (1993)
“Thus, locally assessed taxpayers do not have the right under § 77-506 to request that the State Board equalize their individual property, as part of a class or subclass, with a class or subclass of centrally assessed property or similar property in other counties.”
County of Douglas v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment (1954)
“1943, provides: “At the hearing provided by section 77-508, the legal representatives of the counties may appear and show cause why the valuation or valuations of the real or personal property of their county should not be increased or decreased by the State Board of…”
Carpenter v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment (1965)
“The basic powers and duties of the Board are set out in the applicable statute, section 77-506, R. R. S. 1943, which states- in part as- follows-: “The State Board of Equalization and Assessment shall proceed to- examine the abstracts of real and.”
DeCamp v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment (1979)
“§ 77-506 et seq., R. R. S. 1943. The valuation by the county boards of equalization as equalized by the State Board of Equalization binds the subdivisions of government.”
County of Grant v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment (1954)
“The County further asserts that under the provisions *315 of section 77-506, R. R. S. 1943, the State Board shall proceed to examine the abstracts of real and personal property assessed for taxation in the several counties of the state, and shall equalize such assessment so as…”
Carpenter v. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION & ASSESS. (1965)
“The basic powers and duties of the Board are set out in the applicable statute, section 77-506, R.R.S.1943, which states in part as follows: "The State Board of Equalization and Assessment shall proceed to examine the abstracts of real and personal property assessed for taxation…”
Hall County v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment (1996)
“The Legislature has charged the board with the responsibility and duty to give effect to the constitutional requirement that all taxes be levied uniformly and proportionately upon all real property. Pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 77-505 et seq.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.