Nebraska Revised Statutes
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 77-508 (2026)
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
77-508.
Transferred to section 77-5026.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases, 1946–1980 · leading case: Box Butte Cnty. v. State Bd. of Equalization & Assessment, 295 N.W.2d 670 (Neb. 1980).
Box Butte Cnty. v. State Bd. of Equalization & Assessment, 295 N.W.2d 670 (Neb. 1980). “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 77-508 (Reissue 1976) requires that “the board shall issue a notice to the counties which the board deems either undervalued or overvalued, and shall set a date for hearing at least five days following the mailing of such notice.”
Cnty. of Douglas v. State Bd. of Equalization & Assessment, 63 N.W.2d 449 (Neb. 1954). “Pursuant to section 77-508, R. R. S. 1943, notice was mailed to the county clerk, county assessor, and chairman of the county board of Douglas County.”
Cnty. of Howard v. State Bd. of Equalization & Assessment, 63 N.W.2d 441 (Neb. 1954). “Pursuant to section 77-508, R. R. S. 1943, notice was mailed to the county clerk, county assessor, and chairman of the county board of Howard County.”
Cnty. of Lancaster v. State Bd. of Equalization & Assessment, 143 N.W.2d 885 (Neb. 1966). “The board notified all counties as section 77-508, R. R. S. 1943, specifically called for, but the county argues that section 84-913, R.”
Laflin v. State Bd. of Equalization & Assessment, 56 N.W.2d 469 (Neb. 1953). “Notice was thereupon given to 19 counties falling within this classification to show cause on July 30, 1952, pursuant to section 77-508, R. R. S. 1943, why such increases should not be made.”
Cnty. of Buffalo v. State Bd. of Equalization & Assessment, 63 N.W.2d 468 (Neb. 1954). “We have taken cognizance of the different affidavits appearing in the record with respect as to whether the chairman of the county board of supervisors of the County received notice or failed to receive the same, and the affidavits of the Tax Commissioner, the assistant tax…”
Cnty. of Blaine v. State Bd. of Equalization & Assessment, 143 N.W.2d 880 (Neb. 1966). “Section 77-508, R. R. S. 1943, provides that if the state board finds that it is necessary to change the valuation of real or personal property as returned by any- county, the board shall issue a notice to the county and set a date for hearing; , Section 77^509, R.”
Fromkin v. State, 63 N.W.2d 332 (Neb. 1954). “” Sections 77-508, 77-509, and 77-510, R. R.”
Carpenter v. State Bd. of Equalization & Assessment, 134 N.W.2d 272 (Neb. 1965). “The appearances before the Board were in response to a notice sent pursuant to section 77-508, R. R. S. 1943, to the county clerk, assessor, and chairman of the county board of the 93 counties, ordering the county to appear for hearing to show why the assessed valuation of urban…”
Cnty. of Grant v. State Bd. of Equalization & Assessment, 63 N.W.2d 459 (Neb. 1954). “Pursuant to section 77-508, R. R. S. 1943, notice was mailed to the county clerk, county assessor, and chairman of the county board of Grant County.”
Cnty. of Antelope v. State Bd. of Equalization & Assessment, 21 N.W.2d 416 (Neb. 1946). “” In the brief of the four county attorneys representing appellants, it is assigned as error: (1) That said order of the State Board of Equalization and Assessment is illegal and void for the reason that prior to the entry thereof no notice was issued to the respective counties…”
Carpenter v. State Bd. of Equalization & Assess., 134 N.W.2d 272 (Neb. 1965). “The appearances before the Board were in response to a notice sent pursuant to section 77-508, R.R.S.1943, to the county clerk, assessor, and chairman of the county board of the 93 counties, ordering the county to appear for hearing to show why the assessed valuation of urban…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.