Every decision and order adverse to a party to the proceeding, rendered by an agency in a contested case, shall be in writing or stated in the record and shall be accompanied by findings of fact and conclusions of law. The findings of fact shall consist of a concise statement of the conclusions upon each contested issue of fact. Parties to the proceeding shall be notified of the decision and order in person or by mail. A copy of the decision and order and accompanying findings and conclusions shall be delivered or mailed upon request to each party or his or her attorney of record.
Notes of Decisions
Nebraska Liquor Distributors, Inc. v. Nebraska Liquor Control Comm'n, 693 N.W.2d 539 (Neb. 2005).
· cites it 5× “” NLD alleges that the statement in the record at the Commission hearing falls short of this standard. However, the Commission’s written decision clearly meets the standard set forth in § 84-915, whether or not the statement in the record does.”
Cent. Platte Nat. Resources Dist. v. State, 513 N.W.2d 847 (Neb. 1994).
· cites it 4× “See Neb.Rev.Stat. § 84-915 (Reissue 1987). "The findings of fact shall consist of a concise statement of the conclusions upon each contested issue of fact.”
Prigge v. Johns, 165 N.W.2d 559 (Neb. 1969).
· cites it 8× “The findings of fact shall consist of a concise statement of the conclusions upon each contested issue of fact.”
Yellow Cab Co. v. Nebraska State Ry. Comm'n, 127 N.W.2d 211 (Neb. 1964).
· cites it 10× “2d 922 , we reversed the original order because no findings on contested issues of fact under section 84-915, R. S. Supp., 1961, had been made and therefore there was “no basis upon which to review the order of the commission * * Under the authority of Petroleum Transp.”
In Re Covault Freeholder Petition, 359 N.W.2d 349 (Neb. 1984).
· cites it 2× “While it is true that the State Board of Education is required, under the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 84-915 (Reissue 1981), to prepare findings of fact and conclusions of law, it is also true that the language of § 79-403(1) pertaining to the time for taking appeal is…”
Lariat Club, Inc. v. Nebraska Liquor Control Comm'n, 673 N.W.2d 29 (Neb. 2004).
· cites it 2× “The Lariat Club claims, restated, that (1) the Commission denied the Lariat Club due process by failing to give the Lariat Club proper notice of the issues involved at the hearing; (2) the Commission was without authority to cancel the liquor license of the Lariat Club; (3) the…”
Weeks v. State Bd. of Educ., 284 N.W.2d 843 (Neb. 1979).
· cites it 2× “(4) The findings made by the State Board of Education were not sufficient to satisfy the requirements of section 84-915, R. R. S. 1943. (5) The various reasons given by the District Court for its decision were without merit.”
McChesney v. City of North Platte, 343 N.W.2d 925 (Neb. 1984).
· cites it 2× “Rather, on appellate review we determine only whether the findings of the commission are supported by substantial evidence or whether they were arbitrary or capricious.”
Young v. Morgan Drive Away, Inc., 107 N.W.2d 752 (Neb. 1961).
· cites it 2× “But appellants call our attention to section 84-915, R. S. Supp., 1959, which was enacted by the Legislature subsequent to our holding in Ferguson Trucking Co.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.