Tilbe v. Warden of the Nevada State Prison, 620 P.2d 860 (Nev. 1980). · Go Syfert
Tilbe v. Warden of the Nevada State Prison, 620 P.2d 860 (Nev. 1980). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
14 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Watson (Charles) v. State (nev, 2014-10-15)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" Watson (Charles) v. State
Nev. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bonacci v. State, 96 Nev. 894, 899 , 620 P.2d 1244, 1247 (1980) (holding that the failure to request an instruction precludes appellate consideration unless there is plain error); see also Green V.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Shrader v. State (2×)
Nev. · 1985 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Bonacci v. State, 96 Nev. 894 , 620 P.2d 1244 (1980) (defendant may not claim jury incorrectly instructed on affirmative defense of entrapment where he did not object to instructions at trial); Wyatt v. State, 77 Nev. 490 , 367 P.2d 104 (1961) (upholding district court's refusal to give entrapment instruction where no substantial evidence of entrapment and stating "[e]ntrapment is an affirmative defense ... that a defendant must prove").
cited Cited "see, e.g." Daly v. State
Nev. · 1983 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Bonacci v. State, 96 Nev. 894, 897 , 620 P.2d 1244, 1246 (1980).
RONALD C. TILBE
v.
WARDEN OF THE NEVADA STATE PRISON
No. 12530.
Nevada Supreme Court.
Dec 18, 1980.
620 P.2d 860
Norman Y. Herring, State Public Defender, and Thomas J. Ray, Special Deputy Public Defender, Carson City, for Appellant., Richard H. Bryan, Attorney General, and Robert C. Manley, Deputy Attorney General, Carson City, for Respondent.
Published

OPINION

Per Curiam:

For the reasons stated in and on the authority of Krewson v. Warden, 96 Nev. 886, 620 P.2d 859 (1980), the order of the district court is reversed and the case is remanded for a determination of whether sufficient grounds exist which excuse appellant’s failure to raise the issues contained in his petition on a direct appeal from his conviction, and if so, for resolution of the merits of the petition.