Nev. Rev. Stat. § 108.236

Court must declare rank of lien claimants or class of lien claimants; application of proceeds

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 108.236  Court must declare rank of lien claimants or class of lien claimants; application of proceeds.

      1.  In every case in which different liens are asserted against any property, the court, in the judgment, must declare the rank of each lien claimant or class of lien claimants in the following order:

      (a) First: All labor whether performed at the instance or direction of the owner, the subcontractor or the prime contractor.

      (b) Second: Material suppliers and lessors of equipment.

      (c) Third: All other lien claimants who have performed their work, in whole or in part, under contract with the prime contractor or any subcontractor.

      (d) Fourth: All other lien claimants.

      2.  The proceeds of the sale of the property must be applied to each lien claimant or class of lien claimants in the order of its rank.

      (Added to NRS by 1965, 1164; A 1993, 2056; 2003, 2607)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2002–2016 · leading case: Simmons Self-Storage Partners, LLC v. Rib Roof, Inc.
Simmons Self-Storage Partners, LLC v. Rib Roof, Inc. (2011) nev “NRS 108.236; NRS 108.239(7) and (9). Once the lienable amount has been determined, the court generally must order the property sold: On ascertaining the whole amount of the liens with which the property is justly chargeable, as provided in NRS 108.”
A.F. Construction Co. v. Virgin River Casino Corp. (2002) nev · cites it 2× “Other than the required determination of asserted mechanic’s liens pursuant to NRS 108.236, we hold that priority of other claims against the property may be established in a subsequent proceeding and need not be established in the enforcement proceeding.”
AF Constr. Co. v. VIRGIN RIVER CASINO CO. (2002) nev · cites it 2× “Other than the required determination of asserted mechanic's liens pursuant to NRS 108.236, we hold that priority of other claims against the property may be established in a subsequent proceeding and need not be established in the enforcement proceeding.”
S. HIGHLANDS CMTY. ASS'N. VS. SAN FLORENTINE AVE. TRUST (2016) nev · cites it 2× “See NRS 108.236; NRS 108.239(11). We find this approach persuasive for three reasons.”
S. HIGHLANDS CMTY. ASS'N. VS. SAN FLORENTINE AVE. TRUST (2016) nev “See NRS 108.236; NRS 108.239(11). We find this approach persuasive for three reasons.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.