Nev. Rev. Stat. § 111.325
Unrecorded conveyances void as against subsequent bona fide purchaser for value when conveyance recorded
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 111.325 Unrecorded conveyances void as against subsequent bona fide
purchaser for value when conveyance recorded. Every
conveyance of real property within this State hereafter made, which shall not
be recorded as provided in this chapter, shall be void as against any
subsequent purchaser, in good faith and for a valuable consideration, of the
same real property, or any portion thereof, where his or her own conveyance
shall be first duly recorded.
[26:9:1861; A 1935, 34; 1931 NCL § 1498]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 24
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1970–2025 · leading case: Daisy Trust v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Daisy Trust v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (2019)
“210 and NRS 111.325 as the relevant statutes. Respectively, those statutes currently provide that "any assignment of the beneficial interest under a deed of trust must be recorded" and that "[e]very conveyance of real property within this State .”
Berge v. Fredericks (1979)
“The claim of Valdez is based upon a quitclaim deed from Fredericks to her dated December 22, 1975, and recorded on the same date. The court below granted summary judgment for respondent V aldez, on the ground that there was no genuine issue of material fact.”
RH Kids, LLC v. MTC Fin. (2019)
“at 7 (citing NRS § 111.325 ). Finally, RH Kids contends that the Foreclosure Bar cannot preempt Nevada criminal statutes such as NRS § 205.”
Allison Steel Manufacturing Co. v. Bentonite, Inc. (1970)
“Appellant relies upon the recording act NRS 111.325, which reads: “Every conveyance of real property within this state hereafter made, which shall not be recorded as provided in this chapter, shall be void as against any subsequent purchaser, in good faith and for a valuable…”
Huntington v. Mila, Inc. (2003)
“NRS 111.325, Nevada’s statutory recording act, provides: Every conveyance of real property within this state hereafter made, which shall not be recorded as provided in this chapter, shall be void as against any subsequent purchaser, in good faith and for a valuable…”
In Re Grant (2003)
“§ 111.325. While § 544(a)(3) creates the legal fiction of a perfect BFP and renders the trustee’s actual notice of prior grantees irrelevant, “constructive or inquiry notice” obtained in accordance with state law can defeat a trustee’s claim.”
Tai-Si Kim v. Kearney (2012)
“However, an unrecorded property interest is “void as against any subsequent purchaser, in good *1088 faith and for a valuable consideration” if the subsequent purchaser’s interest is “first duly recorded.”
West Charleston Lofts I, LLC v. R & O Construction Co. (2013)
“Bona Fide Purchaser Without Notice The parties’ arguments regarding whether the Third Party Defendants took without actual or constructive notice are premature in the context of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.”
LAKES v. U.S. BANK TR. (2021)
“RSPOD - Relying on NRS 111.325, Lakes argues that if the first deed of trust survived the foreclosure sale, the district court nevertheless erred in quieting title in U.”
Buhecker v. R.B. Petersen & Sons Construction Co. (1996)
“320; NRS 111.325. The Buheckers contend that neither Petersen nor Leader were bona fide purchasers for value, since the Buheckers’ actual possession of the property provided Petersen and Leader with constructive notice of their (Buheckers’) interest in the property.”
DAISY TR. VS. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. (2019)
“210 and NRS 111.325 as the relevant statutes. Respectively, those statutes currently provide that "any assignment of the beneficial interest under a deed of trust must be recorded!' and that "[elvery conveyance of real property within this State .”
Citimortgage, Inc. v. Trp Fund Vi, LLC (2019)
“220 3 and NRS 111.325 required appellant or Fannie Mae to record an assignment demonstrating Fannie Mae's interest in the deed of trust, but we disagree.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.