Nev. Rev. Stat. § 116.2103

Construction and validity of declaration and bylaws

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 116.2103  Construction and validity of declaration and bylaws.

      1.  The inclusion in a governing document of an association of a provision that violates any provision of this chapter does not render any other provisions of the governing document invalid or otherwise unenforceable if the other provisions can be given effect in accordance with their original intent and the provisions of this chapter.

      2.  The rule against perpetuities and NRS 111.103 to 111.1039, inclusive, do not apply to defeat any provision of the declaration, bylaws, rules or regulations adopted pursuant to NRS 116.3102.

      3.  If a conflict exists between the declaration and the bylaws, the declaration prevails except to the extent the declaration is inconsistent with this chapter.

      4.  Title to a unit and common elements is not rendered unmarketable or otherwise affected by reason of an insubstantial failure of the declaration to comply with this chapter. Whether a substantial failure impairs marketability is not affected by this chapter.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 544; A 2003, 2225; 2011, 2421)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2009–2009 · leading case: Boulder Oaks Community Ass'n v. B & J Andrews Enterprises, LLC
Boulder Oaks Community Ass'n v. B & J Andrews Enterprises, LLC (2009) nev “See NRS 116.2103(1) (noting that the inclusion of a provision in a governing document that “violates any provision of this chapter does not render any other provisions of the governing document invalid or otherwise unenforceable”).”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 116.2103(1) — 1 case
Boulder Oaks Community Ass'n v. B & J Andrews Enterprises, LLC (2009) nev “See NRS 116.2103(1) (noting that the inclusion of a provision in a governing document that “violates any provision of this chapter does not render any other provisions of the governing document invalid or otherwise unenforceable”).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.