Nevada Revised Statutes
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 14.060 (2026)
Proceedings where there are several defendants and part only are served
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 14.060 Proceedings where there are several defendants and part only are
served. Where the action is
against two or more defendants, and the summons is served on one or more but
not on all of them, the plaintiff may proceed as follows:
1. If the action be against the defendants jointly indebted upon a contract, the plaintiff may proceed against the defendant served, unless the court otherwise directs; and if the plaintiff recover judgment, it may be entered against all the defendants thus jointly indebted, so far only as that it may be enforced against the joint property of all and the separate property of the defendant served; or
2. If the action be against defendants severally liable, the plaintiff may proceed against the defendants served in the same manner as if they were the only defendants.
[1911 CPA § 89; RL § 5031; NCL § 8587]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1969–2017 · leading case: Diamond Nat'l Corp. v. Thunderbird Hotel, Inc., 454 P.2d 13 (Nev. 1969).
Diamond Nat'l Corp. v. Thunderbird Hotel, Inc., 454 P.2d 13 (Nev. 1969). “150 1 and NRS 14.060 2 read together are clearly dispositive of this case.”
Rawson Vs. Dist. Ct. (cain), 2017 NV 44 (Nev. 2017). “Nevada modified the merger effect of the common law rule in NRS 14.060(1) and created a process to extend a judgment entered against one joint debtor to an unserved joint debtor through NRS 17.”
Rawson Vs. Dist. Ct. (cain), 2017 NV 44 (Nev. 2017). “Nevada modified the merger effect of the common law rule in NRS 14.060(1) and created a process to extend a judgment entered against one joint debtor to an unserved joint debtor through NRS 17.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 14.060(1) — 2 cases
Rawson Vs. Dist. Ct. (cain), 2017 NV 44 (Nev. 2017). “Nevada modified the merger effect of the common law rule in NRS 14.060(1) and created a process to extend a judgment entered against one joint debtor to an unserved joint debtor through NRS 17.”
Rawson Vs. Dist. Ct. (cain), 2017 NV 44 (Nev. 2017). “Nevada modified the merger effect of the common law rule in NRS 14.060(1) and created a process to extend a judgment entered against one joint debtor to an unserved joint debtor through NRS 17.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.