Nevada Revised Statutes
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 170.090 (2026)
Security to keep peace
✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 170.090 Security to keep peace.
1. If, however, there is a just reason to fear the commission of the offense, the person complained of may be required to enter into a bond, in such sum, not exceeding $5,000, as the magistrate may direct, with one or more sufficient sureties, to keep the peace toward the people of this State, and particularly toward the complainant.
2. The bond shall be valid and binding for 6 months, and may, upon the renewal of the complaint, be extended for a longer period or a new bond may be required.
[1911 Cr. Prac. § 19; RL § 6869; NCL § 10666]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2019–2019 · leading case: U.S. Bank v. SFR Investments Pool I, LLC, No. 2:15-cv-00218 (D. Nev. Sept. 19, 2019).
U.S. Bank v. SFR Investments Pool I, LLC, No. 2:15-cv-00218 (D. Nev. Sept. 19, 2019). “The Nevada Supreme Court broke from the Ninth Circuit and determined that NRS § 116 8 indeed incorporated the notice provisions in NRS § 170.090. Id. at 1253. In fact, the Nevada 9 Supreme Court considered the Ninth Circuit’s position and expressly “decline[d] to follow the 10…”
Bank of Am. N.A v. Inspirada Cmty. Ass'n, No. 2:16-cv-00673 (D. Nev. Sept. 26, 2019). “The Nevada 17 Supreme Court broke from the Ninth Circuit and determined that NRS § 116 indeed incorporated 18 the notice provisions in NRS § 170.090. Id. at 1253. In fact, the Nevada Supreme Court 19 considered the Ninth Circuit’s position and expressly “decline[d] to follow the…”
Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Pac. Sunset Vill. Homeowners Ass'n, No. 2:16-cv-02174 (D. Nev. Sept. 30, 2019). “The Nevada 5 Supreme Court broke from the Ninth Circuit and determined that NRS § 116 indeed incorporated 6 the notice provisions in NRS § 170.090. Id. at 1253. In fact, the Nevada Supreme Court 7 considered the Ninth Circuit’s position and expressly “decline[d] to follow the…”
Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, No. 2:17-cv-00457 (D. Nev. Sept. 9, 2019). “NRS § 170.090(3)(a)–(b). The statute ensures 16 that a lender or other lien holder receives notice if they stand to lose their interest due to the 17 association’s foreclosure.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 170.090(3)(a): 4 cases
Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, No. 2:17-cv-00457 (D. Nev. Sept. 9, 2019). “NRS § 170.090(3)(a)–(b). The statute ensures 16 that a lender or other lien holder receives notice if they stand to lose their interest due to the 17 association’s foreclosure.”
U.S. Bank v. SFR Investments Pool I, LLC, No. 2:15-cv-00218 (D. Nev. Sept. 19, 2019). “The Nevada Supreme Court broke from the Ninth Circuit and determined that NRS § 116 8 indeed incorporated the notice provisions in NRS § 170.090. Id. at 1253. In fact, the Nevada 9 Supreme Court considered the Ninth Circuit’s position and expressly “decline[d] to follow the 10…”
Bank of Am. N.A v. Inspirada Cmty. Ass'n, No. 2:16-cv-00673 (D. Nev. Sept. 26, 2019). “The Nevada 17 Supreme Court broke from the Ninth Circuit and determined that NRS § 116 indeed incorporated 18 the notice provisions in NRS § 170.090. Id. at 1253. In fact, the Nevada Supreme Court 19 considered the Ninth Circuit’s position and expressly “decline[d] to follow the…”
Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Pac. Sunset Vill. Homeowners Ass'n, No. 2:16-cv-02174 (D. Nev. Sept. 30, 2019). “The Nevada 5 Supreme Court broke from the Ninth Circuit and determined that NRS § 116 indeed incorporated 6 the notice provisions in NRS § 170.090. Id. at 1253. In fact, the Nevada Supreme Court 7 considered the Ninth Circuit’s position and expressly “decline[d] to follow the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.