NRS
172.097 Supervision of grand jury by impaneling judge; limitations on
and review of expenditures; monthly statement by county treasurer.
1. The district judge impaneling a grand
jury shall supervise its proceedings.
2. The grand jury shall submit an itemized
list of its expenditures no less often than every 3 months or a fraction
thereof to the judge who impaneled it.
3. The grand jury shall not spend money or
incur a debt exceeding the amount of money budgeted for its use unless it first
obtains the approval of the judge who impaneled it. The judge shall inform the
board of county commissioners of any expenditure or indebtedness the judge so
approves.
4. The county treasurer shall provide to
the grand jury a monthly statement of its expenditures for the preceding month
and the balance remaining of the money appropriated for its use.
(Added to NRS by 1985,
556)
POWERS AND DUTIES OF GRAND JURY
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
5
cases, 1988–2013 · leading case:
Hill v. State, 188 P.3d 51 (Nev. 2008).
Hill v. State, 188 P.3d 51 (Nev. 2008).
· cites it 5× “8 Duty to inform the district court of potential grand juror bias NRS 172.097 governs grand jury proceedings and provides that “[t]he district judge impaneling a grand jury shall supervise its *551 proceedings.”
Lane v. Second Jud. Dist. Court, Washoe Cnty., 760 P.2d 1245 (Nev. 1988).
· cites it 2× “Further, we noted that control of the grand jury’s functions is not vested in the district attorney or his office and that the grand jury should function independently of the prosecution.”
Lane v. Second Jud. Dist., Washoe Cnty., 760 P.2d 1245 (Nev. 1988).
· cites it 2× “Further, we noted that control of the grand jury's functions is not vested in the district attorney or his office and that the grand jury should function independently of the prosecution.”
Rugamas v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct. (Nev. 2013).
“As a general matter, the grand jury is an arm of the court and the court that impanels the grand jury also supervises its proceedings, see NRS 172.097, but nothing in our statutes, the Nevada Constitution, or this court's jurisprudence suggests that the district court's…”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 172.097(1): 2 cases
Lane v. Second Jud. Dist. Court, Washoe Cnty., 760 P.2d 1245 (Nev. 1988).
“Further, we noted that control of the grand jury’s functions is not vested in the district attorney or his office and that the grand jury should function independently of the prosecution.”
Lane v. Second Jud. Dist., Washoe Cnty., 760 P.2d 1245 (Nev. 1988).
“Further, we noted that control of the grand jury's functions is not vested in the district attorney or his office and that the grand jury should function independently of the prosecution.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.