NRS
174.035 Types of pleas; procedure for entering plea.
1. A defendant may plead not guilty,
guilty, guilty but mentally ill or, with the consent of the court, nolo
contendere. The court may refuse to accept a plea of guilty or guilty but
mentally ill.
2. If a plea of guilty or guilty but
mentally ill is made in a written plea agreement, the agreement must be in
substantially the form prescribed in NRS
174.063. If a plea of guilty or guilty but mentally ill is made orally, the
court shall not accept such a plea or a plea of nolo contendere without first
addressing the defendant personally and determining that the plea is made
voluntarily with understanding of the nature of the charge and consequences of
the plea.
3. With the consent of the court and the
district attorney, a defendant may enter a conditional plea of guilty, guilty
but mentally ill or nolo contendere, reserving in writing the right, on appeal
from the judgment, to a review of the adverse determination of any specified
pretrial motion. A defendant who prevails on appeal must be allowed to withdraw
the plea.
4. Upon an unconditional waiver of a
preliminary hearing, a defendant and the district attorney may enter into a
written conditional plea agreement, subject to the court accepting the
recommended sentence pursuant to the agreement.
5. A plea of guilty but mentally ill must
be entered not less than 21 days before the date set for trial. A defendant who
has entered a plea of guilty but mentally ill has the burden of establishing
the defendant’s mental illness by a preponderance of the evidence. Except as
otherwise provided by specific statute, a defendant who enters such a plea is
subject to the same criminal, civil and administrative penalties and procedures
as a defendant who pleads guilty.
6. The defendant may, in the alternative
or in addition to any one of the pleas permitted by subsection 1, plead not
guilty by reason of insanity. A plea of not guilty by reason of insanity must
be entered not less than 21 days before the date set for trial. A defendant who
has not so pleaded may offer the defense of insanity during trial upon good
cause shown. Under such a plea or defense, the burden of proof is upon the
defendant to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that:
(a) Due to a disease or defect of the mind, the
defendant was in a delusional state at the time of the alleged offense; and
(b) Due to the delusional state, the defendant
either did not:
(1) Know or understand the nature and
capacity of his or her act; or
(2) Appreciate that his or her conduct was
wrong, meaning not authorized by law.
7. If a defendant refuses to plead or if
the court refuses to accept a plea of guilty or guilty but mentally ill or if a
defendant corporation fails to appear, the court shall enter a plea of not
guilty.
8. A defendant may not enter a plea of
guilty or guilty but mentally ill pursuant to a plea bargain for an offense
punishable as a felony for which:
(a) Probation is not allowed; or
(b) The maximum prison sentence is more than 10
years,
Ê unless the
plea bargain is set forth in writing and signed by the defendant, the
defendant’s attorney, if the defendant is represented by counsel, and the
prosecuting attorney.
9. If the court accepts a plea of guilty
but mentally ill pursuant to this section, the court shall cause, within 5
business days after acceptance of the plea, on a form prescribed by the
Department of Public Safety, a record of that plea to be transmitted to the
Central Repository for Nevada Records of Criminal History along with a
statement indicating that the record is being transmitted for inclusion in each
appropriate database of the National Instant Criminal Background Check System.
10. As used in this section:
(a) “Disease or defect of the mind” does not
include a disease or defect which is caused solely by voluntary intoxication.
(b) “National Instant Criminal Background Check
System” has the meaning ascribed to it in NRS
179A.062.
(Added to NRS by 1967,
1415; A 1991,
301, 1062;
1995,
1534, 2450;
1997,
641; 2003,
1457; 2007,
1405; 2009,
2484; 2015,
1795; 2017,
1246)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
114
cases (
12 in the last 5 years), 1970–2026 · leading case:
Finger v. State
Finger v. State (2001)
nev · cites it 18×
“637 at 2448-85 (amending NRS 174.035, 193.220 and 194.010 and repealing 175.”
State v. Freese (2000)
nev · cites it 16×
“The right to appeal the conviction, with the assistance of an attorney, either appointed or retained, unless the appeal is based upon reasonable constitutional jurisdictional or other grounds that challenge the legality of the proceedings and except as otherwise provided in…”
Blake v. State (2005)
nev · cites it 6×
“Blake argues that the district court's ruling was erroneous because he complied with the statutory requirements of NRS 174.035(4) by reserving his right to plead not guilty by reason of insanity.”
O'GUINN v. State (2002)
nev · cites it 8×
“035(4) creating a plea of guilty but mentally ill unconstitutional and rejected the amended version of NRS 174.035(3) "in its entirety." [7] We further determined that "legal insanity is a well-established and fundamental principal of the law of the United States" protected by…”
McConnell v. State (2009)
nev · cites it 2×
“McConnell farther claims that the plea was invalid under NRS 174.035(7) because it was not memorialized in a written plea agreement.”
Schoels v. State (1998)
nev · cites it 6×
“He argues that a plea of guilty would have allowed the jury to deliberate the degree of the alleged homicide without being influenced by knowledge of his ex-felon status.”
Commonwealth v. Gomez (2018)
mass · cites it 3×
“§ 46-12-204 (3) ; Nev. Rev. Stat. § 174.035 (3) ; N.Y. Crim.”
PUNDYK (EDWARD) VS. STATE (2020)
nev · cites it 12×
“: In resolving this appeal, we consider the admissibility of psychiatric expert witness testimony regarding a defendanes mental state for purposes of establishing that the defendant meets the not-guilty-by- reason-of-insanity standard under NRS 174.035(6). The Washoe County…”
Standen v. State (1983)
nev · cites it 8×
“*1160 NRS 174.035 prohibits acceptance of a guilty plea "without first addressing the defendant personally and determining that the plea is made .”
Neuhaus v. People (2012)
colo
“§ 46-12-204(3); Nev.Rev.Stat. § 174.035(3); N.Y.Crim. Proc.”
Galloway v. State (2010)
ind · cites it 2×
“1456 , 1457 (codified as amended at Nev. Rev.Stat. Ann. § 174.035 (West Supp.”
Glenn v. Commonwealth (2007)
vactapp · cites it 2×
“§ 46-12-204(3); Nev.Rev.Stat. § 174.035(3); N.J.R. 3:9-3(f); State v.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 174.035(1) — 40 cases
Schoels v. State (1998)
nev
“He argues that a plea of guilty would have allowed the jury to deliberate the degree of the alleged homicide without being influenced by knowledge of his ex-felon status.”
State v. Freese (2000)
nev
“The right to appeal the conviction, with the assistance of an attorney, either appointed or retained, unless the appeal is based upon reasonable constitutional jurisdictional or other grounds that challenge the legality of the proceedings and except as otherwise provided in…”
Standen v. State (1983)
nev
“*1160 NRS 174.035 prohibits acceptance of a guilty plea "without first addressing the defendant personally and determining that the plea is made .”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 174.035(10)(a) — 2 cases
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 174.035(10Xa) — 1 case
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 174.035(2) — 9 cases
State v. Freese (2000)
nev
“The right to appeal the conviction, with the assistance of an attorney, either appointed or retained, unless the appeal is based upon reasonable constitutional jurisdictional or other grounds that challenge the legality of the proceedings and except as otherwise provided in…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 174.035(3) — 29 cases
Finger v. State (2001)
nev
“637 at 2448-85 (amending NRS 174.035, 193.220 and 194.010 and repealing 175.”
Neuhaus v. People (2012)
colo
“§ 46-12-204(3); Nev.Rev.Stat. § 174.035(3); N.Y.Crim. Proc.”
Glenn v. Commonwealth (2007)
vactapp
“§ 46-12-204(3); Nev.Rev.Stat. § 174.035(3); N.J.R. 3:9-3(f); State v.”
O'GUINN v. State (2002)
nev
“035(4) creating a plea of guilty but mentally ill unconstitutional and rejected the amended version of NRS 174.035(3) "in its entirety." [7] We further determined that "legal insanity is a well-established and fundamental principal of the law of the United States" protected by…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 174.035(4) — 5 cases
Blake v. State (2005)
nev
“Blake argues that the district court's ruling was erroneous because he complied with the statutory requirements of NRS 174.035(4) by reserving his right to plead not guilty by reason of insanity.”
O'GUINN v. State (2002)
nev
“035(4) creating a plea of guilty but mentally ill unconstitutional and rejected the amended version of NRS 174.035(3) "in its entirety." [7] We further determined that "legal insanity is a well-established and fundamental principal of the law of the United States" protected by…”
Finger v. State (2001)
nev
“637 at 2448-85 (amending NRS 174.035, 193.220 and 194.010 and repealing 175.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 174.035(5) — 8 cases
Finger v. State (2001)
nev
“637 at 2448-85 (amending NRS 174.035, 193.220 and 194.010 and repealing 175.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 174.035(5)(a)(2) — 1 case
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 174.035(6) — 7 cases
PUNDYK (EDWARD) VS. STATE (2020)
nev
“: In resolving this appeal, we consider the admissibility of psychiatric expert witness testimony regarding a defendanes mental state for purposes of establishing that the defendant meets the not-guilty-by- reason-of-insanity standard under NRS 174.035(6). The Washoe County…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 174.035(6)(a) — 1 case
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 174.035(6)(b) — 2 cases
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 174.035(7) — 1 case
McConnell v. State (2009)
nev
“McConnell farther claims that the plea was invalid under NRS 174.035(7) because it was not memorialized in a written plea agreement.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 174.035(8) — 1 case
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 174.035(9) — 2 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.