Nev. Rev. Stat. § 174.035

Types of pleas; procedure for entering plea

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 174.035  Types of pleas; procedure for entering plea.

      1.  A defendant may plead not guilty, guilty, guilty but mentally ill or, with the consent of the court, nolo contendere. The court may refuse to accept a plea of guilty or guilty but mentally ill.

      2.  If a plea of guilty or guilty but mentally ill is made in a written plea agreement, the agreement must be in substantially the form prescribed in NRS 174.063. If a plea of guilty or guilty but mentally ill is made orally, the court shall not accept such a plea or a plea of nolo contendere without first addressing the defendant personally and determining that the plea is made voluntarily with understanding of the nature of the charge and consequences of the plea.

      3.  With the consent of the court and the district attorney, a defendant may enter a conditional plea of guilty, guilty but mentally ill or nolo contendere, reserving in writing the right, on appeal from the judgment, to a review of the adverse determination of any specified pretrial motion. A defendant who prevails on appeal must be allowed to withdraw the plea.

      4.  Upon an unconditional waiver of a preliminary hearing, a defendant and the district attorney may enter into a written conditional plea agreement, subject to the court accepting the recommended sentence pursuant to the agreement.

      5.  A plea of guilty but mentally ill must be entered not less than 21 days before the date set for trial. A defendant who has entered a plea of guilty but mentally ill has the burden of establishing the defendant’s mental illness by a preponderance of the evidence. Except as otherwise provided by specific statute, a defendant who enters such a plea is subject to the same criminal, civil and administrative penalties and procedures as a defendant who pleads guilty.

      6.  The defendant may, in the alternative or in addition to any one of the pleas permitted by subsection 1, plead not guilty by reason of insanity. A plea of not guilty by reason of insanity must be entered not less than 21 days before the date set for trial. A defendant who has not so pleaded may offer the defense of insanity during trial upon good cause shown. Under such a plea or defense, the burden of proof is upon the defendant to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that:

      (a) Due to a disease or defect of the mind, the defendant was in a delusional state at the time of the alleged offense; and

      (b) Due to the delusional state, the defendant either did not:

             (1) Know or understand the nature and capacity of his or her act; or

             (2) Appreciate that his or her conduct was wrong, meaning not authorized by law.

      7.  If a defendant refuses to plead or if the court refuses to accept a plea of guilty or guilty but mentally ill or if a defendant corporation fails to appear, the court shall enter a plea of not guilty.

      8.  A defendant may not enter a plea of guilty or guilty but mentally ill pursuant to a plea bargain for an offense punishable as a felony for which:

      (a) Probation is not allowed; or

      (b) The maximum prison sentence is more than 10 years,

Ê unless the plea bargain is set forth in writing and signed by the defendant, the defendant’s attorney, if the defendant is represented by counsel, and the prosecuting attorney.

      9.  If the court accepts a plea of guilty but mentally ill pursuant to this section, the court shall cause, within 5 business days after acceptance of the plea, on a form prescribed by the Department of Public Safety, a record of that plea to be transmitted to the Central Repository for Nevada Records of Criminal History along with a statement indicating that the record is being transmitted for inclusion in each appropriate database of the National Instant Criminal Background Check System.

      10.  As used in this section:

      (a) “Disease or defect of the mind” does not include a disease or defect which is caused solely by voluntary intoxication.

      (b) “National Instant Criminal Background Check System” has the meaning ascribed to it in NRS 179A.062.

      (Added to NRS by 1967, 1415; A 1991, 301, 1062; 1995, 1534, 2450; 1997, 641; 2003, 1457; 2007, 1405; 2009, 2484; 2015, 1795; 2017, 1246)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 114 cases (12 in the last 5 years), 1970–2026 · leading case: Finger v. State
Finger v. State (2001) nev · cites it 18× “637 at 2448-85 (amending NRS 174.035, 193.220 and 194.010 and repealing 175.”
State v. Freese (2000) nev · cites it 16× “The right to appeal the conviction, with the assistance of an attorney, either appointed or retained, unless the appeal is based upon reasonable constitutional jurisdictional or other grounds that challenge the legality of the proceedings and except as otherwise provided in…”
Blake v. State (2005) nev · cites it 6× “Blake argues that the district court's ruling was erroneous because he complied with the statutory requirements of NRS 174.035(4) by reserving his right to plead not guilty by reason of insanity.”
O'GUINN v. State (2002) nev · cites it 8× “035(4) creating a plea of guilty but mentally ill unconstitutional and rejected the amended version of NRS 174.035(3) "in its entirety." [7] We further determined that "legal insanity is a well-established and fundamental principal of the law of the United States" protected by…”
McConnell v. State (2009) nev · cites it 2× “McConnell farther claims that the plea was invalid under NRS 174.035(7) because it was not memorialized in a written plea agreement.”
Schoels v. State (1998) nev · cites it 6× “He argues that a plea of guilty would have allowed the jury to deliberate the degree of the alleged homicide without being influenced by knowledge of his ex-felon status.”
Commonwealth v. Gomez (2018) mass · cites it 3× “§ 46-12-204 (3) ; Nev. Rev. Stat. § 174.035 (3) ; N.Y. Crim.”
PUNDYK (EDWARD) VS. STATE (2020) nev · cites it 12× “: In resolving this appeal, we consider the admissibility of psychiatric expert witness testimony regarding a defendanes mental state for purposes of establishing that the defendant meets the not-guilty-by- reason-of-insanity standard under NRS 174.035(6). The Washoe County…”
Standen v. State (1983) nev · cites it 8× “*1160 NRS 174.035 prohibits acceptance of a guilty plea "without first addressing the defendant personally and determining that the plea is made .”
Neuhaus v. People (2012) colo “§ 46-12-204(3); Nev.Rev.Stat. § 174.035(3); N.Y.Crim. Proc.”
Galloway v. State (2010) ind · cites it 2× “1456 , 1457 (codified as amended at Nev. Rev.Stat. Ann. § 174.035 (West Supp.”
Glenn v. Commonwealth (2007) vactapp · cites it 2× “§ 46-12-204(3); Nev.Rev.Stat. § 174.035(3); N.J.R. 3:9-3(f); State v.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 174.035(1) — 40 cases
Schoels v. State (1998) nev “He argues that a plea of guilty would have allowed the jury to deliberate the degree of the alleged homicide without being influenced by knowledge of his ex-felon status.”
Bryant v. State (1986) nev
State v. Freese (2000) nev “The right to appeal the conviction, with the assistance of an attorney, either appointed or retained, unless the appeal is based upon reasonable constitutional jurisdictional or other grounds that challenge the legality of the proceedings and except as otherwise provided in…”
Standen v. State (1983) nev “*1160 NRS 174.035 prohibits acceptance of a guilty plea "without first addressing the defendant personally and determining that the plea is made .”
Hanley v. State (1981) nev
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 174.035(10)(a) — 2 cases
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 174.035(10Xa) — 1 case
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 174.035(2) — 9 cases
State v. Freese (2000) nev “The right to appeal the conviction, with the assistance of an attorney, either appointed or retained, unless the appeal is based upon reasonable constitutional jurisdictional or other grounds that challenge the legality of the proceedings and except as otherwise provided in…”
State v. Hodge (1994) nm
Ybarra v. State (1987) nev
Lee v. State (1999) nev
Sparks v. State (2005) nev
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 174.035(3) — 29 cases
Finger v. State (2001) nev “637 at 2448-85 (amending NRS 174.035, 193.220 and 194.010 and repealing 175.”
Neuhaus v. People (2012) colo “§ 46-12-204(3); Nev.Rev.Stat. § 174.035(3); N.Y.Crim. Proc.”
Glenn v. Commonwealth (2007) vactapp “§ 46-12-204(3); Nev.Rev.Stat. § 174.035(3); N.J.R. 3:9-3(f); State v.”
Proferes v. State (2000) nev
O'GUINN v. State (2002) nev “035(4) creating a plea of guilty but mentally ill unconstitutional and rejected the amended version of NRS 174.035(3) "in its entirety." [7] We further determined that "legal insanity is a well-established and fundamental principal of the law of the United States" protected by…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 174.035(4) — 5 cases
Blake v. State (2005) nev “Blake argues that the district court's ruling was erroneous because he complied with the statutory requirements of NRS 174.035(4) by reserving his right to plead not guilty by reason of insanity.”
O'GUINN v. State (2002) nev “035(4) creating a plea of guilty but mentally ill unconstitutional and rejected the amended version of NRS 174.035(3) "in its entirety." [7] We further determined that "legal insanity is a well-established and fundamental principal of the law of the United States" protected by…”
Finger v. State (2001) nev “637 at 2448-85 (amending NRS 174.035, 193.220 and 194.010 and repealing 175.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 174.035(5) — 8 cases
Finger v. State (2001) nev “637 at 2448-85 (amending NRS 174.035, 193.220 and 194.010 and repealing 175.”
Proferes v. State (2000) nev
Koerschner v. State (1995) nev
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 174.035(5)(a)(2) — 1 case
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 174.035(6) — 7 cases
PUNDYK (EDWARD) VS. STATE (2020) nev “: In resolving this appeal, we consider the admissibility of psychiatric expert witness testimony regarding a defendanes mental state for purposes of establishing that the defendant meets the not-guilty-by- reason-of-insanity standard under NRS 174.035(6). The Washoe County…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 174.035(6)(a) — 1 case
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 174.035(6)(b) — 2 cases
Bynoe v. Helling (2023) nvd
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 174.035(7) — 1 case
McConnell v. State (2009) nev “McConnell farther claims that the plea was invalid under NRS 174.035(7) because it was not memorialized in a written plea agreement.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 174.035(8) — 1 case
People v. Neuhaus (2009) coloctapp
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 174.035(9) — 2 cases
Hager v. State (2019) nev
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.