Nev. Rev. Stat. § 175.186
Instructions in prosecution for sexual assault or statutory sexual seduction: Use of certain terms and instructions prohibited
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 175.186 Instructions in prosecution for sexual assault or statutory
sexual seduction: Use of certain terms and instructions prohibited.
1. In any prosecution for sexual assault or statutory sexual seduction or for an attempt to commit or conspiracy to commit either crime, the term “unchaste character” may not be used with reference to the alleged victim of the crime in any instruction to the jury.
2. In a prosecution for sexual assault or statutory sexual seduction, the court may not give any instructions to the jury to the effect that it is difficult to prove or establish the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
(Added to NRS by 1975, 1132; A 1977, 1630; 1991, 126)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1988–2003 · leading case: Hardin v. State
Hardin v. State (2003)
“Nev.Rev.Stat. Ann. § 175.186(2) (Michie 1986) (prohibiting instruction that rape accusation is easy to make).”
Lane v. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County (1988)
“NRS 175.186 correspondingly restricts jury instructions: 1.”
Lane v. SECOND JUD. DIST., WASHOE COUNTY (1988)
“NRS 175.186 correspondingly restricts jury instructions: 1.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 175.186(2) — 1 case
Hardin v. State (2003)
“Nev.Rev.Stat. Ann. § 175.186(2) (Michie 1986) (prohibiting instruction that rape accusation is easy to make).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.