Nev. Rev. Stat. § 176.555

Correction of illegal sentence

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 176.555  Correction of illegal sentence.  The court may correct an illegal sentence at any time.

      (Added to NRS by 1967, 1443)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 29 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1974–2021 · leading case: Edwards v. State
Edwards v. State (1996) nev · cites it 2× “1 NRS 176.555 provides: “The [district] court may correct an illegal sentence at any time.”
Steven W. Collier v. Bob Bayer (2005) ca9 · cites it 2× “Nev. Rev. Stat. § 176.555 (1995). But this is a very different proposition from saying that a motion to correct an illegal sentence also re-starts or tolls the time in which to file a habeas petition, which must be filed within one year.”
Grey v. State (2008) nev “30 NRS 176.555 (“The court may correct an illegal sentence at any time.”
Sullivan v. State (2004) nev “9 NRS 176.555. 10 See Dickerson, 114 Nev. at 1087-88 , 967 P.”
Staley v. State (1990) nev · cites it 2× “See NRS 176.555. The state has not argued that appellant's original sentences were illegal.”
Davidson v. State (2008) nev “3d at 163 (citing NRS 176.555). 28 Odoms v. State, 102 Nev.”
State v. Eighth Judicial District Court (1984) nev · cites it 2× “NRS 176.555 provides, "The court may correct an illegal sentence at any time.”
Johnson v. State (2004) nev “724(2)(c); NRS 176.555. 4 See Franklin v. State, 110 Nev.”
Wicker v. State (1995) nev · cites it 2× “JUDGE LEHMAN’S CORRECTION OF THE ILLEGAL SENTENCE NRS 176.555 provides that a district court may correct an illegal sentence at any time.”
Anderson v. State (1974) nev “NRS 176.555 provides that a district court “may correct an illegal sentence at any time.”
Richardson v. Russell (2021) nvd · cites it 3× “See Nev. Rev. Stat. § 176.555 . Richardson himself 7 knows this, because he invoked § 176.”
Fullerton v. State (2000) nev “See NRS 176.555 (providing that “[t]he court may correct an illegal sentence at.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.