Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 176 - JUDGMENT AND EXECUTION
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 176.565 (2026)

Clerical mistakes

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 176.565  Clerical mistakes.  Clerical mistakes in judgments, orders or other parts of the record and errors in the record arising from oversight or omission may be corrected by the court at any time and after such notice, if any, as the court orders.

      (Added to NRS by 1967, 1443)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 33 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1977–2025 · leading case: Ledbetter v. State, 129 P.3d 671 (Nev. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ledbetter v. State, 129 P.3d 671 (Nev. 2006). · cites it 2× “[30] See NRS 176.565 ("Clerical mistakes in judgments, orders or others parts of the record and errors in the record arising from oversight or omission may be corrected by the court at any time and after such notice, if any, as the court orders.”
Medina v. State, 143 P.3d 471 (Nev. 2006). “See NRS 176.565 (providing that clerical error in judgments may be corrected at any time); Buffington v.”
Sullivan v. State, 96 P.3d 761 (Nev. 2004). “8 NRS 176.565. 9 NRS 176.555. 10 See Dickerson, 114 Nev.”
Steven W. Collier v. Bob Bayer, 408 F.3d 1279 (9th Cir. 2005). “10 A judgment of conviction may be amended at any time to correct a clerical error [under NRS § 176.565] or to correct an illegal sentence [under NRS § 176.”
Davidson v. State, 192 P.3d 1185 (Nev. 2008). “9 See NRS 176.565 (“Clerical mistakes in judgments, orders or other parts of the record and errors in the record arising from oversight or omission may be corrected by the court at any time and after such notice, if any, as the court orders.”
State v. Prihoda, 2000 WI 123 (Wis. 2000). “22(3)(g) (West 1994); Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 176.565 (Michie 1997).”
Whitehead v. State, 285 P.3d 1053 (Nev. 2012). “The court noted that NRS 176.565 permits the district court to amend a judgment of conviction to correct such an error “years, even decades, after the entry of the original judgment of conviction.”
Voss v. Russell (D. Nev. 2025). · cites it 7× “) Citing NRS 176.565, 15 the state court “correct[ed] its Amended Judgment of Conviction,” eliminating the citation 16 of NRS 193.”
Ward v. State, 569 P.2d 399 (Nev. 1977). “See NRS 176.565; Singleton v. Sheriff, 86 Nev.”
Casteel (Scott) Vs. State (Nev. 2019). · cites it 4× “565 states "Clerical mistakes in judgment, orders or other parts of the record and errors in the record arising from oversight or omission may be corrected by the court at any time and after such notice, if any, as the court orders.”
Clark (William) v. State (Nev. 2022). · cites it 2× “The record clearly shows that Clark's convictions resulted from a jury trial.”
Clark (Robert) v. State (Nev. 2015). · cites it 2× “The State incorrectly contends that Nevada's general rule that district courts are divested of jurisdiction once a notice of appeal is filed does not divest a district court of its authority to correct a clerical error pursuant to NRS 176.565, which allows the district court to…”
Show all 33 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.