Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 178 - GENERAL PROVISIONS
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 178.610 (2026)

Where no procedure specifically prescribed court may proceed in lawful manner

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 178.610  Where no procedure specifically prescribed court may proceed in lawful manner.  If no procedure is specifically prescribed by this title, the court may proceed in any lawful manner not inconsistent with this title or with any other applicable statute.

      (Added to NRS by 1967, 1458)

THE AGREEMENT ON DETAINERS

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2000–2015 · leading case: Woerner v. Just. Court, 1 P.3d 377 (Nev. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Woerner v. Just. Court, 1 P.3d 377 (Nev. 2000). “” NRS 178.610. Because the reinitiating of the criminal complaint against petitioner is not inconsistent with any other statute, and in fact is in complete accord with the probable cause requirements of NRS 171.”
Moultrie v. State (Nev. 2015). · cites it 2× “COURT OF APPEALS OF NEVADA 12 (0) 1947B he had sufficient notice of the lesser charge); see also NRS 178.610 (providing that a court may proceed in any lawful manner when procedure is not specifically prescribed).”
Moultrie v. State, 2015 NV 93 (Nev. 2015). “COURT OF APPEALS OF NEVADA 12 (0) 19470 e he had sufficient notice of the lesser charge); see also NRS 178.610 (providing that a court may proceed in any lawful manner when procedure is not specifically prescribed).”
Moultrie (matthew) Vs. State, 2015 NV 93 (Nev. 2015). “COURT OF APPEALS OF NEVADA 12 (0) 1947B he had sufficient notice of the lesser charge); see also NRS 178.610 (providing that a court may proceed in any lawful manner when procedure is not specifically prescribed).”
Moultrie (matthew) Vs. State, 2015 NV 93 (Nev. 2015). “COURT OF APPEALS OF NEVADA 12 (0) 1947B he had sufficient notice of the lesser charge); see also NRS 178.610 (providing that a court may proceed in any lawful manner when procedure is not specifically prescribed).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.