Nev. Rev. Stat. § 199.210

Offering false evidence

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

NRS 199.210 Offering false evidence. A person who, upon any trial, hearing, inquiry, investigation or other proceeding authorized by law, offers or procures to be offered in evidence, as genuine, any book, paper, document, record or other instrument in writing, knowing the same to have been forged or fraudulently altered, is guilty of a category D felony and shall be punished as provided in NRS 193.130.

[1911 C&P § 92; RL § 6357; NCL § 10041]—(NRS A 1971, 150; 1979, 1421; 1995, 1175)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1998–2024 · leading case: Siragusa v. Brown

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Siragusa v. Brown (1998) nev · cites it 2× “200), offering false evidence (NRS 199.210), and securities fraud (NRS 90.”

Century Surety Co. v. Prince (2017) nvd · cites it 2× “” Nev. Rev. Stat. § 199.210 . . The court need not address whether the civil conspiracy claim is time-barred under a four-year statute of limitations, or' viable in conjunction with the RICO claim, because Century's RICO claim fails the anti-SLAPP analysis as a matter of law.”

Valley Health Sys., L.L.C. v. Dist. Ct. (Bellavance) (2022) nev · cites it 6× “In its written order, the district court concludes Bellavance presented prima facie evidence "that somebody altered Joseph's medical records," and cites NRS 199.210, which makes it a felony to knowingly offer "forged or fraudulently altered" evidence at a judicial hearing.”

Ingram v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (2024) nvd · cites it 2× “200, NRS § 199.210, NRS § 197.130, and NRS § 200.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.