Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 207 - MISCELLANEOUS CRIMES

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 207.360

“Crime related to racketeering” defined

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 207.360  “Crime related to racketeering” defined.  “Crime related to racketeering” means the commission of, attempt to commit or conspiracy to commit any of the following crimes:

      1.  Murder;

      2.  Manslaughter, except vehicular manslaughter as described in NRS 484B.657;

      3.  Mayhem;

      4.  Battery which is punished as a felony;

      5.  Kidnapping;

      6.  Sexual assault;

      7.  Arson;

      8.  Robbery;

      9.  Taking property from another under circumstances not amounting to robbery;

      10.  Extortion;

      11.  Statutory sexual seduction;

      12.  Extortionate collection of debt in violation of NRS 205.322;

      13.  Forgery, including, without limitation, forgery of a credit card or debit card in violation of NRS 205.740;

      14.  Obtaining and using personal identifying information of another person in violation of NRS 205.463;

      15.  Establishing or possessing a financial forgery laboratory in violation of NRS 205.46513;

      16.  Any violation of NRS 199.280 which is punished as a felony;

      17.  Burglary;

      18.  Grand larceny;

      19.  Bribery or asking for or receiving a bribe in violation of chapter 197 or 199 of NRS which is punished as a felony;

      20.  Battery with intent to commit a crime in violation of NRS 200.400;

      21.  Assault with a deadly weapon;

      22.  Any violation of NRS 453.232, 453.316 to 453.339, inclusive, or NRS 453.375 to 453.401, inclusive;

      23.  Receiving or transferring a stolen vehicle;

      24.  Any violation of NRS 202.260, 202.275 or 202.350 which is punished as a felony;

      25.  Any violation of subsection 2 or 3 of NRS 463.360 or chapter 465 of NRS;

      26.  Receiving, possessing or withholding stolen goods valued at $650 or more;

      27.  Embezzlement of money or property valued at $650 or more;

      28.  Obtaining possession of money or property valued at $650 or more, or obtaining a signature by means of false pretenses;

      29.  Perjury or subornation of perjury;

      30.  Offering false evidence;

      31.  Any violation of NRS 201.300, 201.320, 201.360 or 201.395;

      32.  Any violation of NRS 90.570, 91.230 or 686A.290, or insurance fraud pursuant to NRS 686A.291;

      33.  Any violation of NRS 205.506, 205.920 or 205.930;

      34.  Any violation of NRS 202.445 or 202.446;

      35.  Any violation of NRS 205.377;

      36.  Involuntary servitude in violation of any provision of NRS 200.463 or 200.464 or a violation of any provision of NRS 200.465; or

      37.  Trafficking in persons in violation of any provision of NRS 200.467 or 200.468.

      (Added to NRS by 1983, 1495; A 1989, 18, 160; 1991, 124, 161; 1997, 493; 1999, 2642; 2001, 1100; 2003, 2951; 2005, 79; 2009, 144; 2011, 173; 2013, 2434, 3697; 2017, 511; 2019, 2632, 4443; 2023, 2900)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1988–2025 · leading case: Siragusa v. Brown
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Siragusa v. Brown (1998) nev · cites it 8× “390 and NRS 207.360. In Sedima, S.P.R.L. v. Imrex Co.”
Brown v. Kinross Gold, U.S.A. (2005) nvd · cites it 2× “” Nev.Rev.Stat. § 207.360. To attain standing, a plaintiff must allege injury that flowed from the violation of a predicate RICO act.”
Century Surety Co. v. Prince (2017) nvd · cites it 4× “A predicate act is one of the incidents used to allege racketeering activity, See Nev. Rev. Stat. § 207.360 . . While “proof of prior convictions of 'predicate crimes’ or of a RICO violation is not a prerequisite to a civil RICO cause of action,’’ the predicate acts follow the…”
Hale v. Burkhardt (1988) nev · cites it 3× ““Crimes related to racketeering” are enumerated in NRS 207.360 and include the crime of obtaining money or property valued at $100 or more by false pretenses, the crime that Hale has attempted to charge in his fourth cause of action.”
Allum v. Valley Bank of Nevada (1993) nev · cites it 2× “In his second amended complaint, Allum alleged that the defendants conspired to violate NRS 207.360(26), which then proscribed as a predicate Nevada RICO act obtaining money or property valued at $100 or more by false pretenses.”
Cummings v. Charter Hospital of Las Vegas, Inc. (1995) nev · cites it 3× “Parties may be dropped or added by order of the court on motion of any party or of its own initiative at any stage of the action and on such terms as are just.”
Doud v. Las Vegas Hilton Corp. (1993) nev “We note that the district court denied without explanation Doud’s motion to amend his complaint to allege the following causes of action: (1) malicious defense, (2) spoliation of evi *1107 dence, (3) intentional infliction of emotional distress, and (4) violation of NRS 207.360.…”
State v. Hancock (1998) nev · cites it 2× “390, "racketeering activity" means engaging in at least two crimes related to racketeering which are listed at NRS 207.360. [3] We note that Count II states that Desiano was 65 years of age or older; however, Count I fails to reference this pertinent fact.”
G.K. Las Vegas Ltd. Partnership v. Simon Property Group, Inc. (2006) nvd · cites it 4× “Section 207.360 of the Nevada Revised Statutes explicitly sets forth the activities that may constitute a predicate act under the statute.”
Forsyth v. Humana, Inc. (1993) nvd “§§ 207.360(30), 680A.200, 686A.160, 686A.”
Brown v. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance (1989) nev “See NRS 207.360(13) and (27). FSLIC asserts on appeal, for the first time, that the jury may have found also that Brown’s alleged mutilation of a proposed trial exhibit by deleting certain information on ten RDIL transmittal documents constituted perjury or forgery.”
Motogolf.com, LLC v. Top Shelf Golf, LLC (2021) nvd · cites it 6× “” Motogolf 20 21 22 10 NRS § 207.360 provides several crimes that can form the basis of a racketeering claim.”
Show all 20 citing cases →
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 207.360(10) — 1 case
Lescinsky v. Clark County School District (2019) nvd
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 207.360(13) — 1 case
Brown v. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance (1989) nev “See NRS 207.360(13) and (27). FSLIC asserts on appeal, for the first time, that the jury may have found also that Brown’s alleged mutilation of a proposed trial exhibit by deleting certain information on ten RDIL transmittal documents constituted perjury or forgery.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 207.360(26) — 3 cases
Allum v. Valley Bank of Nevada (1993) nev “In his second amended complaint, Allum alleged that the defendants conspired to violate NRS 207.360(26), which then proscribed as a predicate Nevada RICO act obtaining money or property valued at $100 or more by false pretenses.”
Hale v. Burkhardt (1988) nev ““Crimes related to racketeering” are enumerated in NRS 207.360 and include the crime of obtaining money or property valued at $100 or more by false pretenses, the crime that Hale has attempted to charge in his fourth cause of action.”
Cummings v. Charter Hospital of Las Vegas, Inc. (1995) nev “Parties may be dropped or added by order of the court on motion of any party or of its own initiative at any stage of the action and on such terms as are just.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 207.360(28) — 1 case
T1 Payments LLC v. New U Life Corporation (2022) nvd
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 207.360(30) — 1 case
Forsyth v. Humana, Inc. (1993) nvd “§§ 207.360(30), 680A.200, 686A.160, 686A.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 207.360(33) — 1 case
Balgas (James) v. State (2016) nev
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 207.360(5) — 1 case
Cummings v. Charter Hospital of Las Vegas, Inc. (1995) nev “Parties may be dropped or added by order of the court on motion of any party or of its own initiative at any stage of the action and on such terms as are just.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 207.360(9) — 3 cases
Motogolf.com, LLC v. Top Shelf Golf, LLC (2021) nvd “” Motogolf 20 21 22 10 NRS § 207.360 provides several crimes that can form the basis of a racketeering claim.”
Seaton (Nicole) v. State (2016) nev
Munoz (Jennifer) v. State (2016) nev
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.