Nev. Rev. Stat. § 213.142
Rehearing to be scheduled if parole denied
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 213.142 Rehearing to be scheduled if parole denied.
1. Upon denying the parole of a prisoner, the Board shall schedule a rehearing. The date on which the rehearing is to be held is within the discretion of the Board, but, except as otherwise provided in subsection 2, the elapsed time between hearings must not exceed 3 years.
2. If the prisoner who is being considered for parole has more than 10 years remaining on the term of his or her sentence, not including any credits which may be allowed against his or her sentence, when the Board denies his or her parole, the elapsed time between hearings must not exceed 5 years.
(Added to NRS by 1973, 190; A 1995, 1360; 1999, 134)
Parole Violators
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1989–2025 · leading case: Niergarth v. State
Niergarth v. State (1989)
“Pursuant to NRS 213.142, the Parole. Board has scheduled an additional hearing on June 1, 1989, for the purpose of considering whether to grant appellant parole.”
STEWART (TOMMY) v. NEV. BD. OF PAROLE COMM'R (CRIMINAL) (2025)
“Per NRS 213.142, when a prisoner is denied parole, the Board must schedule a subsequent hearing to determine whether to grant the prisoner parole at that later time.”
McCormick v. Bisbee (2017)
“And to the extent that McCormick challenges the date scheduled for his next parole hearing, the date provided by the Board comports with NRS 213.142(2). 3 We note, however, the district court's error in applying the facially inapplicable NRS 11.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 213.142(1) — 1 case
STEWART (TOMMY) v. NEV. BD. OF PAROLE COMM'R (CRIMINAL) (2025)
“Per NRS 213.142, when a prisoner is denied parole, the Board must schedule a subsequent hearing to determine whether to grant the prisoner parole at that later time.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 213.142(2) — 2 cases
STEWART (TOMMY) v. NEV. BD. OF PAROLE COMM'R (CRIMINAL) (2025)
“Per NRS 213.142, when a prisoner is denied parole, the Board must schedule a subsequent hearing to determine whether to grant the prisoner parole at that later time.”
McCormick v. Bisbee (2017)
“And to the extent that McCormick challenges the date scheduled for his next parole hearing, the date provided by the Board comports with NRS 213.142(2). 3 We note, however, the district court's error in applying the facially inapplicable NRS 11.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.