Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 213 - PARDONS AND PAROLES; REMISSIONS OF FINES AND COMMUTATIONS OF PUNISHMENTS
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 213.142 (2026)

Rehearing to be scheduled if parole denied

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 213.142  Rehearing to be scheduled if parole denied.

      1.  Upon denying the parole of a prisoner, the Board shall schedule a rehearing. The date on which the rehearing is to be held is within the discretion of the Board, but, except as otherwise provided in subsection 2, the elapsed time between hearings must not exceed 3 years.

      2.  If the prisoner who is being considered for parole has more than 10 years remaining on the term of his or her sentence, not including any credits which may be allowed against his or her sentence, when the Board denies his or her parole, the elapsed time between hearings must not exceed 5 years.

      (Added to NRS by 1973, 190; A 1995, 1360; 1999, 134)

Parole Violators

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1989–2025 · leading case: Niergarth v. State, 768 P.2d 882 (Nev. 1989).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Niergarth v. State, 768 P.2d 882 (Nev. 1989). “Pursuant to NRS 213.142, the Parole. Board has scheduled an additional hearing on June 1, 1989, for the purpose of considering whether to grant appellant parole.”
Stewart (tommy) v. Nev. Bd. of Parole Comm'r (Crim.), 141 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 45 (Nev. 2025). · cites it 10× “Per NRS 213.142, when a prisoner is denied parole, the Board must schedule a subsequent hearing to determine whether to grant the prisoner parole at that later time.”
McCormick v. Bisbee, 401 P.3d 1146 (Nev. 2017). “And to the extent that McCormick challenges the date scheduled for his next parole hearing, the date provided by the Board comports with NRS 213.142(2). 3 We note, however, the district court's error in applying the facially inapplicable NRS 11.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 213.142(1): 1 case
Stewart (tommy) v. Nev. Bd. of Parole Comm'r (Crim.), 141 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 45 (Nev. 2025). “Per NRS 213.142, when a prisoner is denied parole, the Board must schedule a subsequent hearing to determine whether to grant the prisoner parole at that later time.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 213.142(2): 2 cases
Stewart (tommy) v. Nev. Bd. of Parole Comm'r (Crim.), 141 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 45 (Nev. 2025). “Per NRS 213.142, when a prisoner is denied parole, the Board must schedule a subsequent hearing to determine whether to grant the prisoner parole at that later time.”
McCormick v. Bisbee, 401 P.3d 1146 (Nev. 2017). “And to the extent that McCormick challenges the date scheduled for his next parole hearing, the date provided by the Board comports with NRS 213.142(2). 3 We note, however, the district court's error in applying the facially inapplicable NRS 11.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.