Nev. Rev. Stat. § 227.160

Auditing and allowance of claims; examination of witnesses and documentary evidence

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 227.160  Auditing and allowance of claims; examination of witnesses and documentary evidence.

      1.  The State Controller shall:

      (a) Audit all claims against the State, for the payment of which an appropriation or authorization has been made but of which the amount has not been definitely fixed by law, which have been examined and passed upon by the State Board of Examiners, or which have been presented to the Board and not examined and passed upon by it within 30 days from their presentation.

      (b) Allow of those claims mentioned in paragraph (a) as not having been passed upon by the State Board of Examiners within 30 days after presentation the whole, or such portion thereof as the State Controller deems just and legal, and of claims examined and passed upon by the State Board of Examiners, such an amount as the State Controller decrees just and legal not exceeding the amount allowed by the Board.

      2.  No claim for services rendered or advances made to the State or any officer thereof may be audited or allowed unless the services or advancement have been specially authorized by law and an appropriation or authorization made for its payment.

      3.  For the purpose of satisfying himself or herself of the justness and legality of any claim, the State Controller may examine witnesses under oath and receive and consider documentary evidence in addition to that furnished him or her by the State Board of Examiners. The State Controller shall draw warrants on the State Treasurer for such amounts as the State Controller allows of claims of the character described in this section, and also for all claims of which the amount has been definitely fixed by law and for the payment of which an appropriation or authorization has been made.

      [5:43:1866; A 1869, 158; B § 2812; BH § 1811; C § 1959; RL § 4158; NCL § 7350]—(NRS A 1969, 1118; 1997, 1287; 2001, 2748)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1962–1992 · leading case: State of Nevada Employees Ass'n v. Daines
State of Nevada Employees Ass'n v. Daines (1992) nev · cites it 3× “As a result of the action of the board of examiners, the respondent state controller refused to issue warrants sufficient to pay the authorized salary increases in the paychecks delivered to state employees beginning on October 11, 1991.”
State v. Second Jud. Dist. Ct. in and for Co. of Washoe (1969) nev “NRS 227.160(2) provides that no claim for services or advances shall be audited or allowed by the state controller unless they shall have been specially authorized by law and an appropriation made for its payment.”
STATE OF NEV. EMP. ASS'N v. Daines (1992) nev · cites it 3× “As a result of the action of the board of examiners, the respondent state controller refused to issue warrants sufficient to pay the authorized salary increases in the paychecks delivered to state employees beginning on October 11, 1991.”
State ex rel. Armstrong v. State Board of Examiners (1962) nev · cites it 2× “The matters concerning which the Board of Examiners and the State Controller may exercise discretion are not here involved.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 227.160(2) — 1 case
State v. Second Jud. Dist. Ct. in and for Co. of Washoe (1969) nev “NRS 227.160(2) provides that no claim for services or advances shall be audited or allowed by the state controller unless they shall have been specially authorized by law and an appropriation made for its payment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.