Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 233B - NEVADA ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 233B.030 (2026)

Definitions

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 233B.030  Definitions.  As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires, the words and terms defined in NRS 233B.031 to 233B.0385, inclusive, have the meanings ascribed to them in those sections.

      (Added to NRS by 1965, 962; A 1967, 807; 1971, 661; 1975, 1790; 1977, 1384; 1999, 2072; 2015, 707)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1970–1982 · leading case: Nevada Indus. Comm'n v. Reese, 560 P.2d 1352 (Nev. 1977).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Nevada Indus. Comm'n v. Reese, 560 P.2d 1352 (Nev. 1977). · cites it 2× “See NRS 233B.030. We interpret the adoption by reference of the Administrative Procedure Act by the 1973 Legislature as a reaffirmation of the legislative *1357 intent to abolish the independent common law action.”
Snow v. Nevada Dep't of Prisons, 543 F. Supp. 752 (D. Nev. 1982). · cites it 2× “Therefore, it is likely that the Nevada Supreme Court, were it to consider the question, would hold that the Nevada Department of Prisons may seek judicial review of adverse agency decisions.”
Mead v. State Dep't of Health, Welfare & Rehab., Servs. to the Blind Divison, 532 P.2d 611 (Nev. 1975). · cites it 8× “030(5) by reliance on the portion of the preamble to NRS 233B.030 that states, "... unless the context otherwise requires.”
Sw. Gas Corp. v. Pub. Serv. Com'n of Nev., 546 P.2d 219 (Nev. 1976). “) NRS 233B.030(2) defines the phrase “contested case” as “.”
Villa v. Arriza-Balaga, 466 P.2d 663 (Nev. 1970). “020), and “agency” means “each public agency, bureau, board, commission, department, division, office or employee of the executive department” (NRS 233B.030). NRS 233B.040 provides that “each agency may adopt reasonable regulations to aid it in carrying out the functions…”
O'Callaghan v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court, 505 P.2d 1215 (Nev. 1973). “312], to one who has been excluded or rejected from any licensed gaming establishment [NRS 463.153(3) (b)], and to a gaming employee who the Commission has found to be guilty of cheating [NRS 463.”
Harrison v. Dep't of Highways, 484 P.2d 716 (Nev. 1971). · cites it 2× “If Policy and Procedure Memorandum 20-8 is a “regulation” within NRS 233B.030(6), it must be filed with the *186 Secretary of State in compliance with NRS 233B.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 233B.030(2) — 1 case
Sw. Gas Corp. v. Pub. Serv. Com'n of Nev., 546 P.2d 219 (Nev. 1976). “) NRS 233B.030(2) defines the phrase “contested case” as “.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 233B.030(5) — 2 cases
Snow v. Nevada Dep't of Prisons, 543 F. Supp. 752 (D. Nev. 1982). “Therefore, it is likely that the Nevada Supreme Court, were it to consider the question, would hold that the Nevada Department of Prisons may seek judicial review of adverse agency decisions.”
Mead v. State Dep't of Health, Welfare & Rehab., Servs. to the Blind Divison, 532 P.2d 611 (Nev. 1975). “030(5) by reliance on the portion of the preamble to NRS 233B.030 that states, "... unless the context otherwise requires.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 233B.030(6) — 1 case
Harrison v. Dep't of Highways, 484 P.2d 716 (Nev. 1971). “If Policy and Procedure Memorandum 20-8 is a “regulation” within NRS 233B.030(6), it must be filed with the *186 Secretary of State in compliance with NRS 233B.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 233B.030(l)(b) — 1 case
Snow v. Nevada Dep't of Prisons, 543 F. Supp. 752 (D. Nev. 1982). “Therefore, it is likely that the Nevada Supreme Court, were it to consider the question, would hold that the Nevada Department of Prisons may seek judicial review of adverse agency decisions.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 233B.030(l)(d) — 1 case
O'Callaghan v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court, 505 P.2d 1215 (Nev. 1973). “312], to one who has been excluded or rejected from any licensed gaming establishment [NRS 463.153(3) (b)], and to a gaming employee who the Commission has found to be guilty of cheating [NRS 463.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.