Nevada Revised Statutes
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 233B.126 (2026)
Limitations on communications of agency’s members or employees rendering decision or making findings of fact and conclusions of law
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 233B.126 Limitations on communications of agency’s members or employees
rendering decision or making findings of fact and conclusions of law. Unless required for the disposition of ex
parte matters authorized by law, members or employees of an agency assigned to
render a decision or to make findings of fact and conclusions of law in a
contested case shall not communicate, directly or indirectly, in connection
with any issue of fact, with any person or party, nor, in connection with any
issue of law, with any party or the party’s representative, except upon notice
and opportunity to all parties to participate. An agency member may, subject to
the provisions of NRS 233B.123:
1. Communicate with other members of the agency.
2. Have the aid and advice of one or more personal assistants.
(Added to NRS by 1967, 809)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1970–2006 · leading case: Miller v. Workforce Saf. & Ins., 2006 ND 1 (N.D. 2006).
Miller v. Workforce Saf. & Ins., 2006 ND 1 (N.D. 2006). “5, § 9055 (2002); Nev.Rev.Stat. § 233B.126 (2003); Okla. Stat.”
Rudin v. Nevada Real Est. Advisory Comm'n, 471 P.2d 658 (Nev. 1970). “When this hearing occurred, neither the real estate code nor *566 the administrative procedure act required such submission to the adversary.”
Miller v. Workforce Saf. & Ins., 2006 ND 1 (N.D. 2006). “5, § 9055 (2002); Nev. Rev. Stat. § 233B.126 (2003); Okla. Stat.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.