Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 233B.150 (2026)

Appeal from final judgment of district court

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 233B.150  Appeal from final judgment of district court.  An aggrieved party may obtain a review of any final judgment of the district court by appeal to the appellate court of competent jurisdiction pursuant to the rules fixed by the Supreme Court pursuant to Section 4 of Article 6 of the Nevada Constitution. The appeal shall be taken as in other civil cases.

      (Added to NRS by 1967, 811; A 2013, 1768)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1975–2025 · leading case: Baldonado v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLC, 194 P.3d 96 (Nev. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Baldonado v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLC, 194 P.3d 96 (Nev. 2008). “24 See NRAP 3A(b)(l); NRS 233B.150. 25 See, e.g., Tarango v. SIIS, 117 Nev.”
State, Dep't of Motor Vehs. v. Bremer, 942 P.2d 145 (Nev. 1997). “This is so even if administrative hearing officers preside over “inferior tribunals.” Thus, to the extent that Article 6, section 6 of the constitution seems to conflict with Article 6, sections 4 and 8, we resolve that conflict in favor of this court’s jurisdiction.”
City of Reno v. Harris, 895 P.2d 663 (Nev. 1995). “An appeal from a district court decision entered upon judicial review of an agency decision is governed by NRS 233B.150, which provides: “An aggrieved party may obtain a review of any final judgment of the district court by appeal to the supreme court.”
State, Dep't of Motor Vehs. & Pub. Saf. v. Evans, 952 P.2d 958 (Nev. 1998). “He argues district courts have final appellate jurisdiction in cases arising in inferior tribunals, including administrative agencies, under article VI, section 6, of the Nevada Constitution.”
Mead v. State Dep't of Health, Welfare & Rehab., Servs. to the Blind Divison, 532 P.2d 611 (Nev. 1975). · cites it 2× “130 and NRS 233B.150. Glen L. Mead was terminated from his employment as business enterprise program manager for the Nevada Bureau of Blind Services for alleged incompetency, inefficiency and negligence in the performance of his duties.”
Rocha v. State, Dep'T Of Health & Human Serv. (Nev. 2022). · cites it 6× “130 provides for judicial review of an adverse agency decision by petition to the district court; NRS 233B.150 provides for "review of any final judgment of the district court by appeal to the appellate court of competent jurisdiction.”
Kassebaum v. State, Dep'T Of Corrs. (Nev. 2022). · cites it 4× “In particular, respondent argues that the order is not a final judgment appealable under NRAP 3A(b)(1) or NRS 233B.150 because the order remands for further substantive proceedings.”
Clark Cnty. Classroom Teachers Ass'n v. Clark Cnty. Sch. Dist., 532 P.2d 1032 (Nev. 1975). “130; NRS 233B.150. Cf. Arant v. Lane, 249 U.S.”
Vill. League v. State, Bd. of Equalization, 2017 NV 1 (Nev. 2017). · cites it 2× “" NRAP 3A(a); see also NRS 233B.150 ("An aggrieved party may obtain a review of any final judgment of the district court by appeal to.”
Doe Vs. Roe (Nev. 2019). · cites it 2× “It also did not appear that the order was appealable under NRAP 3A(b)(2) or NRS 233B.150 as asserted by appellant in the docketing statement.”
Al-Farouk v. Nelson (D. Nev. 2025). · cites it 2× “See Nev. Rev. Stat. § 233B.150 2 (“An aggrieved party may obtain a review of any final judgment of the district court by appeal to 3 the appellate court of competent jurisdiction pursuant to the rules fixed by the Supreme Court 4 pursuant to Section 4 of Article 6 of the Nevada…”
Bell v. State, Emp't SEC. Div. (Nev. 2019). “To the extent appellant appeals from the order denying petition for judicial review entered on August 8, 2018, the notice of appeal was untimely filed. Notice of entry of that order was served electronically and via mail on August 9, 2018.”
Show all 17 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.