Nev. Rev. Stat. § 252.190

Penalty for malfeasance in office or neglect of duty

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

NRS 252.190 Penalty for malfeasance in office or neglect of duty. The district attorney may be prosecuted for malfeasance in office, or neglect of duty, and shall be punished for a gross misdemeanor and as provided in NRS 197.230.

[15:125:1865; B § 2949; BH § 2118; C § 2309; RL § 1606; NCL § 2084]—(NRS A 1959, 121; 1967, 542)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1988–1988 · leading case: Lane v. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Lane v. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County (1988) nev “If, indeed, the judge has evidence proving that the district attorney “concealed” or “hid” evidence of the commission of a serious crime in order to preclude prosecution, action should be taken under NRS 252.190. If, on the other hand, the accusatory recitals of the order are…”

Lane v. SECOND JUD. DIST., WASHOE COUNTY (1988) nev “If, indeed, the judge has evidence proving that the district attorney "concealed" or "hid" evidence of the commission of a serious crime in order to preclude prosecution, action should be taken under NRS 252.190. If, on the other hand, the accusatory recitals of the order are…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.