Nev. Rev. Stat. § 279.572

Contents of redevelopment plan: General requirements

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 279.572  Contents of redevelopment plan: General requirements.  Every redevelopment plan must show:

      1.  The amount of open space to be provided and the layout of streets;

      2.  Limitations on type, size, height, number and proposed use of buildings;

      3.  The approximate number of dwelling units;

      4.  The property to be devoted to public purposes and the nature of those purposes;

      5.  Other covenants, conditions and restrictions which the legislative body prescribes; and

      6.  The proposed method of financing the redevelopment plan in sufficient detail so that the legislative body may determine the economic feasibility of the plan.

      (Added to NRS by 1959, 662; A 1985, 2075; 1991, 2064; 1997, 2558)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2001–2003 · leading case: City of Las Vegas Downtown Redevelopment Agency v. Crockett
City of Las Vegas Downtown Redevelopment Agency v. Crockett (2001) nev · cites it 16× “Instead, the district court formulated a "materiality" test based on the combined effect of (1) NRS 279.572's language that a redevelopment plan "must show" open spaces, street layouts, building limitations, etc.”
City of Las Vegas Downtown Redevelopment Agency v. Pappas (2003) nev · cites it 6× “lthough I agreed with the Crockett majority that redevelopment plan amendments are only necessitated when a proposed project entails a material deviation from the redevelopment plan, and although I agreed that formal amendment of a plan is not per se necessary to commence any…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 279.572(2) — 1 case
City of Las Vegas Downtown Redevelopment Agency v. Crockett (2001) nev “Instead, the district court formulated a "materiality" test based on the combined effect of (1) NRS 279.572's language that a redevelopment plan "must show" open spaces, street layouts, building limitations, etc.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.