Nevada Revised Statutes
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 288.280 (2026)
Controversies concerning prohibited practices to be submitted to Board
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 288.280 Controversies concerning prohibited practices to be submitted to
Board. Any controversy concerning
prohibited practices may be submitted to the Board in the same manner and with
the same effect as provided in NRS 288.110,
except that an alleged failure to provide information as provided by NRS 288.180 must be heard and determined by
the Board as soon as possible after the complaint is filed with the Board.
(Added to NRS by 1971, 1509; A 1977, 758; 2015, 1599; 2019, 2680)
EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF STATE GOVERNMENT
General Provisions
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2002–2015 · leading case: Rosequist v. Int'l Ass'n of Firefighters Local 1908, 49 P.3d 651 (Nev. 2002).
Rosequist v. Int'l Ass'n of Firefighters Local 1908, 49 P.3d 651 (Nev. 2002). “110(2) and NRS 288.280 means that there is no mandatory requirement for the EMRB to hear the complaint.”
Baldonado v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLC, 194 P.3d 96 (Nev. 2008). “110(2) and also citing to NRS 288.280, which provides that any dispute “may” be presented to the Board).”
City of Reno v. Reno Police Prot. Ass'n, 59 P.3d 1212 (Nev. 2002). “12 NRS 288.280 (providing that “[a]ny controversy concerning prohibited practices may be submitted to the board”).”
Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep't. v. Jenkins (Nev. 2015). “110(2) states that "[t]he Board may hear and determine any complaint arising out of the interpretation of, or performance under, the provisions of [NRS Chapter 288] by any local government employer, local government employee or employee organization.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.