Nev. Rev. Stat. § 30.100

Supplemental relief

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 30.100  Supplemental relief.  Further relief based on a declaratory judgment or decree may be granted whenever necessary or proper. The application therefor shall be by petition to a court having jurisdiction to grant relief. If the application be deemed sufficient, the court shall, on reasonable notice, require any adverse party whose rights have been adjudicated by the declaratory judgment or decree, to show cause why further relief should not be granted forthwith.

      [8:22:1929; NCL § 9447]

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases, 1996–2019 · leading case: Baldonado v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLC
Baldonado v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLC (2008) nev “160, they also requested that the court apply that interpretation to the Wynn’s modified policy and to grant them injunctive relief and damages under NRS 30.100. Thus, appellants sought more than a mere determination of their rights under a statute — they sought to void the…”
Southern Nevada Homebuilders Ass'n v. City of North Las Vegas (1996) nev · cites it 3× “However, it is not necessary that such a prayer for injunctive relief be included in the initial complaint, since NRS 30.100 specifically allows supplemental relief based upon a declaratory judgment.”
BOCA PARK MARKETPLACE SYNDICATIONS GRP., LLC VS. HIGCO, INC. (2017) nev · cites it 6× “1993) (explaining that when the declaratory relief action is limited to a request for declaratory judgment, "[r] equests for damages may then be pursued by separate litigation as supplement relief' under provision similar to NRS 30.100); Bankers & Shippers Ins. Co. of N.”
BOCA PARK MARKETPLACE SYNDICATIONS GRP., LLC VS. HIGCO, INC. (2017) nev · cites it 3× “1993) (explaining that when the declaratory relief action is limited to a request for declaratory judgment, "[r] equests for damages may then be pursued by separate litigation as supplement relief' under provision similar to NRS 30.”
Rosemere Estates Property Owners Assoc. v. Lytle C/W 65294/65721 (2015) nev · cites it 3× “On appeal, the Lytles contend that this conclusion was erroneous, as NRS 30.100 expressly authorizes district courts to award monetary damages in declaratory relief actions.”
Rosemere Estates Property Owners Assoc. v. Lytle C/W 65294/65721 (2015) nev · cites it 3× “On appeal, the Lytles contend that this conclusion was erroneous, as NRS 30.100 expressly authorizes district courts to award monetary damages in declaratory relief actions.”
Rosemere Estates Property Owners Assoc. v. Lytle C/W 65294/65721 (2015) nev · cites it 3× “On appeal, the Lytles contend that this conclusion was erroneous, as NRS 30.100 expressly authorizes district courts to award monetary damages in declaratory relief actions.”
Convergence Sys.'S, Inc. Vs. Onsite Mammography, Llc C/W 76671/77656/77658 (2019) nev “See NRS 30.100 (providing that a district court may grant supplemental relief as part of a declaratory judgment "whenever necessary or proper").”
Convergence Sys.'S, Inc. Vs. Onsite Mammography, Llc C/W 76671/77656/77658 (2019) nev “See NRS 30.100 (providing that a district court may grant supplemental relief as part of a declaratory judgment "whenever necessary or proper").”
Convergence Sys.'S, Inc. Vs. Onsite Mammography, Llc C/W 76671/77656/77658 (2019) nev “See NRS 30.100 (providing that a district court may grant supplemental relief as part of a declaratory judgment "whenever necessary or proper").”
Convergence Sys.'S, Inc. Vs. Onsite Mammography, Llc C/W 76671/77656/77658 (2019) nev “See NRS 30.100 (providing that a district court may grant supplemental relief as part of a declaratory judgment "whenever necessary or proper").”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.