Nev. Rev. Stat. § 30.130
Parties
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 30.130 Parties. When
declaratory relief is sought, all persons shall be made parties who have or
claim any interest which would be affected by the declaration, and no declaration
shall prejudice the rights of persons not parties to the proceeding. In any
proceeding which involves the validity of a municipal ordinance or franchise,
such municipality shall be made a party, and shall be entitled to be heard, and
if the statute, ordinance or franchise is alleged to be unconstitutional, the
Attorney General shall also be served with a copy of the proceeding and be
entitled to be heard.
[11:22:1929; NCL § 9450]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1967–2022 · leading case: Liberty Insurance Underwriters Inc. v. Scudier
Liberty Insurance Underwriters Inc. v. Scudier (2013)
“” Dillon goes on to compare the requirements of NRS § 30.”
Rose, LLC v. Treasure Island, LLC (2019)
“In their briefing and during oral argument, the parties did not explicitly address NRS 30.130, which identifies who must be joined in an action seeking only declaratory relief.”
Moldon v. County of Clark (2008)
“23 The record reveals that the district court’s decision to deny the Moldons’ application for interest earned on the condemnation deposit was based in part on the Moldons’ failure to serve the Attorney General under NRS 30.130 with notice of their constitutional challenge to NRS…”
Secretary of State v. STATE LEGISLATURE (2004)
“010(1) (stating that a quo warranto action may be brought against “a person who usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises, a public office”); NRS 30.130 (“When declaratory relief is sought, all persons shall be made parties who have or claim any interest which…”
Crowley v. Duffrin (1993)
“The parties to a declaratory relief action are specified by NRS 30.130 as follows: When declaratory relief is sought, all persons shall be made parties who have or claim any interest which would be affected by the declaration, and no declaration shall prejudice the rights of…”
Wells v. Bank of Nevada (1974)
“The question of standing to challenge the agreement was not tendered to the district court and consequently it proceeded to determine all attacks directed to the validity of the document and the consequences to be expected if the agreement is consummated.”
STATE, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GEN. VS. JUSTICE CT. (ESCALANTE) (2017)
“Upon receiving notification of the justice court's order, the AG filed a "motion to placeS on calendar," arguing that the AG was entitled to notice of the constitutional challenge under NRS 30.130. 2 Escalante objected, arguing that the AG was not entitled to notice before the…”
STATE, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GEN. VS. JUSTICE CT. (ESCALANTE) (2017)
“Upon receiving notification of the justice court's order, the AG filed a "motion to placeS on calendar," arguing that the AG was entitled to notice of the constitutional challenge under NRS 30.130. 2 Escalante objected, arguing that the AG was not entitled to notice before the…”
City of Reno v. Saibini (1967)
“” NRS 30.130 requires the attorney general to be served with a copy of the proceedings and to be given opportunity to be heard in a constitutional attack on any statute, ordinance or franchise in any proceeding.”
ROSE, LLC VS. TREASURE ISLAND, LLC (2019)
“Consequently, Senor Frog's is not a necessary party and Rose is not entitled to relief 4 4 In their briefing and during oral argument, the parties did not explicitly address NRS 30.130, which identifies who must be joined in an action seeking only declaratory relief Under that…”
Rose, LLC v. Treasure Island, LLC (2019)
“Consequently, Senor Frog's is not a necessary party and Rose is not entitled to relief 4 4 In their briefing and during oral argument, the parties did not explicitly address NRS 30.130, which identifies who must be joined in an action seeking only declaratory relief Under that…”
ROSE, LLC VS. TREASURE ISLAND, LLC (2019)
“Consequently, Senor Frog's is not a necessary party and Rose is not entitled to relief 4 4 In their briefing and during oral argument, the parties did not explicitly address NRS 30.130, which identifies who must be joined in an action seeking only declaratory relief Under that…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.