NRS
33.010 Cases in which injunction may be granted. An injunction may be granted in the following
cases:
1. When it shall appear by the complaint
that the plaintiff is entitled to the relief demanded, and such relief or any
part thereof consists in restraining the commission or continuance of the act
complained of, either for a limited period or perpetually.
2. When it shall appear by the complaint
or affidavit that the commission or continuance of some act, during the
litigation, would produce great or irreparable injury to the plaintiff.
3. When it shall appear, during the
litigation, that the defendant is doing or threatens, or is about to do, or is
procuring or suffering to be done, some act in violation of the plaintiff’s
rights respecting the subject of the action, and tending to render the judgment
ineffectual.
[1911 CPA § 195; RL § 5137; NCL § 8693]
Notes of Decisions
Dangberg Holdings Nevada, L.L.C. v. Douglas County (1999)
nev · cites it 4×
“2d 42, 44 (1992); see also NRS 33.010. [2] The decision whether to grant a preliminary injunction is within the sound discretion of the district court, whose decision will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion.”
Sowers v. Forest Hills Subdivision (2013)
nev
“In addition, Sowers argues that the injunction should not have been granted pursuant to NRS 33.010(1) and (2) because the Halls’ complaint merely alleged that the proposed wind turbine will cause inconvenience, annoyance, and *109 hardship, and did not specifically address how…”
City of Sparks v. Sparks Municipal Court (2013)
nev · cites it 2×
“DISCUSSION Standard of review A preliminary injunction is available when it appears from the complaint that the moving party has a reasonable likelihood of success on the merits and the nonmoving party's conduct, if allowed to continue, will cause the moving party irreparable…”
Boulder Oaks Community Ass'n v. B & J Andrews Enterprises, LLC (2009)
nev
“DISCUSSION Standard for granting and reviewing a preliminary injunction A preliminary injunction is available when the moving party can demonstrate that the nonmoving party’s conduct, if allowed to continue, will cause irreparable harm for which compensatory relief is inadequate…”
Dixon v. Thatcher (1987)
nev
“NRS 33.010 provides, in relevant part, “An injunction may be granted in the following cases: .”
Chisholm v. Redfield (1959)
nev
“NRS 33.010. And the power to restrain the breach of a contract under proper circumstances and conditions has long been recognized.”
Aronoff v. Katleman (1959)
nev
“* * *” NRS 33.010. “An injunction may be granted in the following cases: “1.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 33.010(1) — 7 cases
Sowers v. Forest Hills Subdivision (2013)
nev
“In addition, Sowers argues that the injunction should not have been granted pursuant to NRS 33.010(1) and (2) because the Halls’ complaint merely alleged that the proposed wind turbine will cause inconvenience, annoyance, and *109 hardship, and did not specifically address how…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 33.010(3) — 2 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.