Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 38 - MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 38.243

Judgment on award; attorney’s fees and litigation expenses

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 38.243  Judgment on award; attorney’s fees and litigation expenses.

      1.  Upon granting an order confirming, vacating without directing a rehearing, modifying or correcting an award, the court shall enter a judgment in conformity therewith. The judgment may be recorded, docketed and enforced as any other judgment in a civil action.

      2.  A court may allow reasonable costs of the motion and subsequent judicial proceedings.

      3.  On application of a prevailing party to a contested judicial proceeding under NRS 38.239, 38.241 or 38.242, the court may add reasonable attorney’s fees and other reasonable expenses of litigation incurred in a judicial proceeding after the award is made to a judgment confirming, vacating without directing a rehearing, modifying or correcting an award.

      (Added to NRS by 2001, 1282)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2018–2022 · leading case: Pinnacle Minerals Corp. v. Whitehead
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
White v. Baum (2018) nev · cites it 2× “4 Appellants finally argue that the district court improperly awarded respondents attorney fees for a first round of motion practice because respondents were not the "prevailing party" in that round of motion practice for purposes of NRS 38.243(3). We disagree. Even if NRS 38.”
Artemis Expl. Co. Vs. Ruby Lake Estates Hoa (2020) nev · cites it 2× “310(1) (limiting the initiation of certain civil actions brought in district court under NRS Chapter 116 and requiring the action to first be submitted to mediation); NRS 38.243(3) (providing that, "[o]n application of a prevailing party to a contested judicial proceeding under…”
Pinnacle Minerals Corp. v. Whitehead (2019) nvd · cites it 2× “) Section 38.243 concerns only the entry of judgment after confirmation of an arbitration award.”
Hu v. Regal Securities Inc (2020) nvd · cites it 2× “Attorney’s Fees 10 Having prevailed on Petitioner’s Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award and Respondent’ 11 | removed Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award, the Court awards Respondent attorney’s fees 12 | and costs in accordance with Nev. Rev. Stat. § 38.243 (2). Respondent shall…”
Nuveda, Llc Vs. Goldstein (2020) nev “(0) I947A MOP 2_0 — 37cf pursuant to NRS 38.243(1) (providing that the district court shall enter judgment upon confirming an arbitration award).”
In Re: Petition Of Cla Props. Llc C/W 80831 (2022) nev “CLA argues that the district court abused its discretion by not applying NRS 38.243 as the basis for awarding attorney fees and costs.”
Nevada Collectors Association v. State of Nevada Department of Business and Industry Financial Institutions Division (2020) nvd “050, NRS 38.243(3), NRS 18.010(1) and (2), and NRS 3 118A.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 38.243(1) — 1 case
Nuveda, Llc Vs. Goldstein (2020) nev “(0) I947A MOP 2_0 — 37cf pursuant to NRS 38.243(1) (providing that the district court shall enter judgment upon confirming an arbitration award).”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 38.243(3) — 3 cases
White v. Baum (2018) nev “4 Appellants finally argue that the district court improperly awarded respondents attorney fees for a first round of motion practice because respondents were not the "prevailing party" in that round of motion practice for purposes of NRS 38.243(3). We disagree. Even if NRS 38.”
Artemis Expl. Co. Vs. Ruby Lake Estates Hoa (2020) nev “310(1) (limiting the initiation of certain civil actions brought in district court under NRS Chapter 116 and requiring the action to first be submitted to mediation); NRS 38.243(3) (providing that, "[o]n application of a prevailing party to a contested judicial proceeding under…”
Nevada Collectors Association v. State of Nevada Department of Business and Industry Financial Institutions Division (2020) nvd “050, NRS 38.243(3), NRS 18.010(1) and (2), and NRS 3 118A.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.