Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 38 - MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 38.250 (2026)

Nonbinding arbitration of certain civil actions filed in district court required; nonbinding arbitration of certain civil actions filed in justice court authorized; effect of certain agreements by parties to use other alternative methods of resolving disputes

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 38.250  Nonbinding arbitration of certain civil actions filed in district court required; nonbinding arbitration of certain civil actions filed in justice court authorized; effect of certain agreements by parties to use other alternative methods of resolving disputes.

      1.  Except as otherwise provided in NRS 38.310:

      (a) All civil actions filed in district court for damages, if the cause of action arises in the State of Nevada and the amount in issue does not exceed $100,000 per plaintiff, exclusive of attorney’s fees, interest and court costs, must be submitted to nonbinding arbitration in accordance with the provisions of NRS 38.249 to 38.259, inclusive, unless the parties have agreed or are otherwise required to submit the action to an alternative method of resolving disputes established by the Supreme Court pursuant to NRS 38.258, including, without limitation, a settlement conference, mediation or a short trial.

      (b) A civil action for damages filed in justice court may be submitted to binding arbitration or to an alternative method of resolving disputes, including, without limitation, a settlement conference or mediation, if the parties agree to the submission.

      2.  An agreement entered into pursuant to this section must be:

      (a) Entered into at the time of the dispute and not be a part of any previous agreement between the parties;

      (b) In writing; and

      (c) Entered into knowingly and voluntarily.

Ê An agreement entered into pursuant to this section that does not comply with the requirements set forth in this subsection is void.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 1343; A 1993, 556, 1024; 1995, 1419, 2537, 2538; 1999, 852, 1379; 2003, 851; 2005, 391; 2025, 1292)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2009–2009 · leading case: Zamora v. Price, 213 P.3d 490 (Nev. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Zamora v. Price, 213 P.3d 490 (Nev. 2009). · cites it 9× “Equal protection under the law Zamora next contends that requiring the arbitration award to be introduced at trial only for claims under NRS 38.250’s threshold amount violates his equal protection rights under the United States and Nevada Constitutions because his case is…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 38.250(1) — 1 case
Zamora v. Price, 213 P.3d 490 (Nev. 2009). “Equal protection under the law Zamora next contends that requiring the arbitration award to be introduced at trial only for claims under NRS 38.250’s threshold amount violates his equal protection rights under the United States and Nevada Constitutions because his case is…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 38.250(l)(a) — 1 case
Zamora v. Price, 213 P.3d 490 (Nev. 2009). “Equal protection under the law Zamora next contends that requiring the arbitration award to be introduced at trial only for claims under NRS 38.250’s threshold amount violates his equal protection rights under the United States and Nevada Constitutions because his case is…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.