Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 51 - HEARSAY

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 51.135

Record of regularly conducted activity

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 51.135  Record of regularly conducted activity.  A memorandum, report, record or compilation of data, in any form, of acts, events, conditions, opinions or diagnoses, made at or near the time by, or from information transmitted by, a person with knowledge, all in the course of a regularly conducted activity, as shown by the testimony or affidavit of the custodian or other qualified person, is not inadmissible under the hearsay rule unless the source of information or the method or circumstances of preparation indicate lack of trustworthiness.

      (Added to NRS by 1971, 795; A 1977, 1533; 1985, 787; 1989, 322; 1995, 1726)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 35 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1974–2025 · leading case: Daisy Trust v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Daisy Trust v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (2019) nev · cites it 6× “Meyer's declarations were probative on that issue, and both declarations explained how the declarants were qualified to lay a foundation for the admissibility of those documents under NRS 51.135 's business-records exception to the hearsay rule.”
Johnstone v. State (1976) nev · cites it 6× “The recital of a statement of others in a police report is hearsay within hearsay or "double hearsay," NRS 51.365, [2] and is inadmissibile upon proper objection unless it comes within a recognized exception to the hearsay rule independent of the business or public record…”
Summers v. State (2006) nev · cites it 2× “See NRS 51.135. In light of Crawford, the continuing viability of Thomas for this proposition is doubtful where the disciplinary reports contain testimonial statements.”
Miranda v. State (1985) nev · cites it 4× “At trial and again on appeal, Miranda contends that the district court should have admitted the transcribed statements under the "business records" exception to the hearsay rule contained in NRS 51.135(1). [1] The business records exception to the hearsay rule generally permits…”
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NAT'L ASS'N VS. SFR INV.'S POOL 1, LLC (2020) nev · cites it 2× “3d 846, 850-51 (2019) (discussing the evidence demonstrating Freddie Mac's ownership of a loan, including a declaration from the servicer and screenshots of the servicer's business records, and 11 t recognizing that the party challenging the accuracy of such evidence "bore the…”
Theriault v. State (1976) nev · cites it 2× “NRS 51.135 provides that business records are admissible in any form, so long as they are made at or recorded near the time of the transaction and the information therein transmitted by a person having knowledge of the transaction, as shown by the testimony of the custodian or…”
Flores v. State (2005) nev “125 (recorded recollection); NRS 51.135 (record of regularly conducted activity); NRS 51.”
Emmons v. State (1991) nev “With respect to the radiologist’s letter, we reject the state’s contention that it falls under the “record of regularly conducted activity” exception to the hearsay rule, because the state failed to establish that the letter was written “in the course of a regularly conducted…”
Derosa v. First Judicial District Court (1999) nev · cites it 2× “See NRS 51.135. 4 In Thomas’s case, the city argues for application of the public record exception.”
Thomas v. State (1998) nev “Additionally, we conclude that the documents were properly authenticated to be admitted under the business records hearsay exception in NRS 51.135, which provides: A memorandum, report, record or compilation of data, in any form, of acts, events, conditions, opinions or…”
Lucini-Parish Insurance v. Buck (1992) nev · cites it 2× “It should have been admitted as a record of regularly conducted activity under NRS 51.135. NOTES [1] It is noteworthy that Mrs.”
Snow v. State (1985) nev “4 NRS 51.135(1) provides: A memorandum, report, record or data compilation, in any form, of acts, events, conditions, opinions or diagnoses, made at or near the time by, or from information transmitted by, a person with knowledge, all in the course of a regularly conducted…”
Show all 35 citing cases →
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 51.135(1) — 5 cases
Miranda v. State (1985) nev “At trial and again on appeal, Miranda contends that the district court should have admitted the transcribed statements under the "business records" exception to the hearsay rule contained in NRS 51.135(1). [1] The business records exception to the hearsay rule generally permits…”
Emmons v. State (1991) nev “With respect to the radiologist’s letter, we reject the state’s contention that it falls under the “record of regularly conducted activity” exception to the hearsay rule, because the state failed to establish that the letter was written “in the course of a regularly conducted…”
Snow v. State (1985) nev “4 NRS 51.135(1) provides: A memorandum, report, record or data compilation, in any form, of acts, events, conditions, opinions or diagnoses, made at or near the time by, or from information transmitted by, a person with knowledge, all in the course of a regularly conducted…”
A.L.M.N., Inc. v. Rosoff (1988) nev
SOLDO-ALLESIO v. FERGUSON (2025) nevapp
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.