Nevada Revised Statutes
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 6.140 (2026)
Application to appellate court for order directing selection and impaneling of grand jury
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 6.140 Application to appellate court for order directing selection and
impaneling of grand jury. In any
county, if the district judge for any reason fails or refuses to select a grand
jury when required, any interested person resident of the county may apply to
the appellate court of competent jurisdiction pursuant to the rules fixed by
the Supreme Court pursuant to Section 4
of Article 6 of the Nevada Constitution for an order directing the
selection of a grand jury. The application must be supported by affidavits
setting forth the true facts as known to the applicant, and the certificate of
the county clerk that a grand jury has not been selected within the time fixed
or otherwise as the facts may be. The appellate court of competent jurisdiction
pursuant to the rules fixed by the Supreme Court shall issue its order, if
satisfied that a grand jury should be called, directing the county clerk to
select and impanel a grand jury, according to the provisions of NRS 6.110 to 6.132, inclusive.
[8b:65:1873; added 1953, 12]—(NRS A 1973, 1273; 2001, 752; 2013, 1731)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1966–2017 · leading case: Gier v. Ninth Jud. Dist. Court, 789 P.2d 1245 (Nev. 1990).
Gier v. Ninth Jud. Dist. Court, 789 P.2d 1245 (Nev. 1990). “135(1), which authorizes the district court to impanel a grand jury solely to investigate state affairs upon the request of the governor or the legislature, “does not purport in any way to limit the powers of a grand jury impaneled pursuant to NRS 6.”
Dickerson v. Grand Jury of Washoe Cnty., 412 P.2d 441 (Nev. 1966). “130 or NRS 6.140. It is, of course, true that had a grand jury been impaneled upon request of the governor or legislature to inquire into the affairs of the state hospital, its sole duty would be to investigate and report.”
Anderson v. Chambers (Nev. 2017). “Here, appellant's remedy is to file a petition pursuant to NRS 6.140; an appeal is not available. Accordingly, as we lack jurisdiction, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.”
Anderson v. Bisbee (Nev. 2017). “See SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA en (0) 1941A i7-o5 7 7 1 NRS 6.140 (noting the proper procedure is to "apply" to the appellate court).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.