Nev. Rev. Stat. § 602.010

Filing of certificate with county clerk; certain series of members of limited-liability company deemed to be doing business in State under assumed or fictitious name

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 602.010  Filing of certificate with county clerk; certain series of members of limited-liability company deemed to be doing business in State under assumed or fictitious name.

      1.  Every person doing business in this State under an assumed or fictitious name that is in any way different from the legal name of each person who owns an interest in the business must file with the county clerk of each county in which the business is being conducted a certificate containing the information required by NRS 602.020.

      2.  A person intending to conduct a business under an assumed or fictitious name may, before initiating the conduct of the business, file a certificate with the county clerk of each county in which the business is intended to be conducted.

      3.  A series created pursuant to NRS 86.296 and doing business in this State shall be deemed to be doing business in this State under an assumed or fictitious name that is different from the legal name of each person who owns an interest in the business, if the name of the series does not indicate:

      (a) That it is a series; and

      (b) The name of the limited-liability company which authorized the creation of the series pursuant to NRS 86.296.

      [Part 1:156:1923; NCL § 4450]—(NRS A 1969, 67; 1973, 545; 1993, 1022; 2001, 810; 2003, 3190; 2017, 2796)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1969–2019 · leading case: Loomis v. Whitehead
Loomis v. Whitehead (2008) nev · cites it 20× “[2] *1056 DISCUSSION The district court found that Loomis and Shanahan conducted business under a fictitious name without filing a fictitious name certificate with the Elko County Clerk as required by NRS 602.010. [3] The district court therefore concluded that, pursuant to NRS…”
Brad Associates v. Nevada Federal Financial Corp. (1993) nev · cites it 8× “In its answers, the Credit Union alleged as an affirmative defense that Brad Associates had failed to file with the Clark County Clerk a fictitious name certificate (a “certificate”) as required by NRS 602.010. Thereafter, the Credit Union moved to dismiss the action pursuant to…”
American Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Stanton-Cudahy Lumber Co. (1969) nev “NRS 602.010, 602.070. The district court found that Stanton-Cudahy was not “doing business” in Nevada.”
Wayne v. Buehler (1987) nvd · cites it 6× “NRS §§ 602.010 and 602.020 require a general partnership doing business in Nevada under an assumed or fictitious name to file, with the county clerk of the county in which the partnership’s business is carried on, a certificate containing, along with other information, the names…”
Heizer v. Zephyr Heights General Improvement District (2019) nvd · cites it 2× “) She 6 further alleges that she filed a Fictious Firm Name Certificate (“Certificate”) in Douglas 7 County pursuant to NRS § 602.010,3 but she never filed the Certificate with the Court.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 602.010(1) — 1 case
Loomis v. Whitehead (2008) nev “[2] *1056 DISCUSSION The district court found that Loomis and Shanahan conducted business under a fictitious name without filing a fictitious name certificate with the Elko County Clerk as required by NRS 602.010. [3] The district court therefore concluded that, pursuant to NRS…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.