Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 613.120 (2026)

Unlawful to demand or receive fee or commission as condition to giving or continuing employment to worker; penalty

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 613.120  Unlawful to demand or receive fee or commission as condition to giving or continuing employment to worker; penalty.

      1.  It shall be unlawful for any manager, superintendent, officer, agent, servant, foreman, shift boss or other employee of any person or corporation, charged or entrusted with the employment of any workers or laborers, or with the continuance of workers or laborers in employment, to demand or receive, either directly or indirectly, from any worker or laborer, employed through his or her agency or worked or continued in employment under his or her direction or control, any fee, commission or gratuity of any kind or nature as the price or condition of the employment of any such worker or laborer, or as the price or condition of his or her continuance in such employment.

      2.  Any such manager, superintendent, officer, agent, servant, foreman, shift boss or other employee of any person or corporation, charged or entrusted with the employment of laborers or workers for his or her principal, or under whose direction or control such workers and laborers are engaged in work and labor for such principal, who shall demand or receive, either directly or indirectly, any fee, commission or gratuity of any kind or nature from any worker or laborer employed by him or her or through his or her agency or worked under his or her direction and control, either as the price and condition of the employment of such worker or laborer or as the price and condition of the continuance of such worker or laborer in such employment, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.

      [1:51:1915; 1919 RL p. 3392; NCL § 10605]—(NRS A 1967, 632)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2008–2025 · leading case: Baldonado v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLC, 194 P.3d 96 (Nev. 2008).
Baldonado v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLC, 194 P.3d 96 (Nev. 2008). · cites it 6× “100 (unlawful for employers to require employees to rebate compensation earned and paid), and NRS 613.120 (unlawful for managers and shift bosses to receive gratuities from employees as a condition of the employees’ employment).”
Wynn Las Vegas, LLC v. Baldonado, 311 P.3d 1179 (Nev. 2013). · cites it 6× “100, and NRS 613.120, which govern compensation and employment practices, because it required the dealers to share their tips with employees of different ranks.”
Christensen (D. Nev. 2025). · cites it 5× “100; (3) unlawful demand to receive fee or commission as a condition of giving 24 or continuing employment to work under NRS 613.120; (4) violation of the Family Medical 25 26 1 Defendants responded, (ECF No.”
Cross v. Anthony & Sylvan Pools, Corp. (D. Nev. 2020). “100, or 23 NRS 613.120.”). Unlike plaintiff’s first two claims, this claim’s defect cannot be remedied 24 through amendment.”
Christensen v. Findlay ARN, LLC (D. Nev. 2025). “Audi moved to compel 17 arbitration, arguing that Christensen’s claims are subject to a valid arbitration 18 agreement between the parties.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.