Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 616A.020 (2026)

Rights and remedies exclusive; terms and conditions for payment of compensation conclusive, compulsory and obligatory; application of exclusive remedies to certain employers

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 616A.020  Rights and remedies exclusive; terms and conditions for payment of compensation conclusive, compulsory and obligatory; application of exclusive remedies to certain employers.

      1.  The rights and remedies provided in chapters 616A to 616D, inclusive, of NRS for an employee on account of an injury by accident sustained arising out of and in the course of the employment shall be exclusive, except as otherwise provided in those chapters, of all other rights and remedies of the employee, his or her personal or legal representatives, dependents or next of kin, at common law or otherwise, on account of such injury.

      2.  The terms, conditions and provisions of chapters 616A to 616D, inclusive, of NRS for the payment of compensation and the amount thereof for injuries sustained or death resulting from such injuries shall be conclusive, compulsory and obligatory upon both employers and employees coming within the provisions of those chapters.

      3.  The exclusive remedy provided by this section to a principal contractor extends, with respect to any injury by accident sustained by an employee of any contractor in the performance of the contract, to every architect, land surveyor or engineer who performs services for:

      (a) The contractor;

      (b) The owner of the property; or

      (c) Any such beneficially interested persons.

      4.  The exclusive remedy provided by this section applies to the owner of a construction project who provides industrial insurance coverage for the project by establishing and administering a consolidated insurance program pursuant to NRS 616B.710 to the extent that the program covers the employees of the contractors and subcontractors who are engaged in the construction of the project.

      5.  When an employee of a state or local government employer is injured by accident sustained during the course of employment while participating in an activity which is carried out cooperatively by the state or local government employer with another state or local government employer, the exclusive remedy provided by this section extends to the state or local government employer of the injured employee and any act or failure to act which creates liability on the part of any of the government employers participating in the activity shall be deemed to be the act or failure to act of the government employer of the injured employee for the purposes of the rights and remedies provided in chapters 616A to 616D, inclusive, of NRS.

      6.  If an employee receives any compensation or accident benefits under chapters 616A to 616D, inclusive, of NRS, the acceptance of such compensation or benefits shall be in lieu of any other compensation, award or recovery against his or her employer under the laws of any other state or jurisdiction and such employee is barred from commencing any action or proceeding for the enforcement or collection of any benefits or award under the laws of any other state or jurisdiction.

      [27:168:1947; 1943 NCL § 2680.27]—(NRS A 1971, 885; 1973, 624; 1989, 230; 1999, 3139; 2011, 782)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 30 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1997–2025 · leading case: Wood v. Safeway, Inc., 121 P.3d 1026 (Nev. 2005).
Wood v. Safeway, Inc., 121 P.3d 1026 (Nev. 2005). · cites it 14× “Therefore, under the contributed to or increased the risk test, Doe's injury falls within the coverage of the NIIA, and her claims are barred by NRS 616A.020. [43] As such, no genuine issues of material fact remain, and summary judgment was appropriate in this case.”
Richards v. Repub. Silver State Disposal, Inc., 148 P.3d 684 (Nev. 2006). · cites it 6× “[11] In return for providing such coverage, the NIIA's exclusive remedy provision, NRS 616A.020, immunizes those employers and their employees from lawsuits connected with another employee's industrial injury.”
Law Offices of Barry Levinson, P.C. v. Milko, 184 P.3d 378 (Nev. 2008). “2d 756, 758 (1999) (citing NRS 616A.020(1)). 12 NRS 616A.030. 13 NRS 616A.”
Harris v. Rio Hotel & Casino, Inc., 25 P.3d 206 (Nev. 2001). · cites it 2× “NOTES [1] See NRS 616A.020(1), which states in part: The rights and remedies provided [by the NIIA] for an employee on account of an injury by accident sustained arising out of and in the course of the employment shall be exclusive, except as otherwise provided [in the NIIA], of…”
Zurbriggen v. Twin Hill Acquisition Co., 338 F. Supp. 3d 875 (E.D. Ill. 2018). “20 (West 2018) ; Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 616A.020 (West 2018) ; N.”
Advanced Countertop Design, Inc. v. Second Jud. Dist. Court, 984 P.2d 756 (Nev. 1999). · cites it 3× “020(1) (“The rights and remedies provided in chapters 616A to 616D, inclusive, of NRS for an employee on account of an injury by accident sustained arising out of and in the course of the employment shall be exclusive, except as otherwise provided in those chapters, of all other…”
Baiguen v. Harrah's Las Vegas, LLC, 426 P.3d 586 (Nev. 2018). · cites it 2× “" NRS 616A.020(1) ; see Wood , 121 Nev. at 732 , 121 P.”
Conway v. Circus Circus Casinos, Inc., 8 P.3d 837 (Nev. 2000). · cites it 2× “” NRS 616A.020(1). An injury is defined, in relevant part, as “a sudden and tangible happening of a traumatic nature, producing an immediate or prompt result which is established by medical evidence.”
Fanders v. Riverside Resort & Casino, Inc., 245 P.3d 1159 (Nev. 2010). · cites it 2× “” NRS 616A.020(1) (emphasis added). The statute defines an accident as “an unexpected or unforeseen event happening suddenly and violently, with or without human fault, and producing at the time objective symptoms of an injury.”
Tucker v. Action Equip. & Scaffold Co., 951 P.2d 1027 (Nev. 1997). “370(1) (recodified as NRS 616A.020(1)) (“[t]he rights and remedies provided in this chapter for an employee on account of an injury by accident sustained arising out of and in the course of the employment shall be exclusive”).”
Seput v. Lacayo, 134 P.3d 733 (Nev. 2006). “5 NRS 616A.020(1). 6 Harris v. Rio Hotel & Casino, 117 Nev.”
Lipps v. S. Nevada Paving, 998 P.2d 1183 (Nev. 2000). · cites it 2× “612(3); NRS 616A.020(1); NRS 616C.215(2)(a). Thus, we hold that the district court properly granted summary judgment in this matter.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 616A.020(1) — 26 cases
Wood v. Safeway, Inc., 121 P.3d 1026 (Nev. 2005). “Therefore, under the contributed to or increased the risk test, Doe's injury falls within the coverage of the NIIA, and her claims are barred by NRS 616A.020. [43] As such, no genuine issues of material fact remain, and summary judgment was appropriate in this case.”
Richards v. Repub. Silver State Disposal, Inc., 148 P.3d 684 (Nev. 2006). “[11] In return for providing such coverage, the NIIA's exclusive remedy provision, NRS 616A.020, immunizes those employers and their employees from lawsuits connected with another employee's industrial injury.”
Law Offices of Barry Levinson, P.C. v. Milko, 184 P.3d 378 (Nev. 2008). “2d 756, 758 (1999) (citing NRS 616A.020(1)). 12 NRS 616A.030. 13 NRS 616A.”
Harris v. Rio Hotel & Casino, Inc., 25 P.3d 206 (Nev. 2001). “NOTES [1] See NRS 616A.020(1), which states in part: The rights and remedies provided [by the NIIA] for an employee on account of an injury by accident sustained arising out of and in the course of the employment shall be exclusive, except as otherwise provided [in the NIIA], of…”
Advanced Countertop Design, Inc. v. Second Jud. Dist. Court, 984 P.2d 756 (Nev. 1999). “020(1) (“The rights and remedies provided in chapters 616A to 616D, inclusive, of NRS for an employee on account of an injury by accident sustained arising out of and in the course of the employment shall be exclusive, except as otherwise provided in those chapters, of all other…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 616A.020(l) — 1 case
Wood v. Safeway, Inc., 121 P.3d 1026 (Nev. 2005). “Therefore, under the contributed to or increased the risk test, Doe's injury falls within the coverage of the NIIA, and her claims are barred by NRS 616A.020. [43] As such, no genuine issues of material fact remain, and summary judgment was appropriate in this case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.