Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 616C - INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE: BENEFITS FOR INJURIES OR DEATH
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 616C.100 (2026)

Additional determination of percentage of disability permitted if cost paid by injured employee; authority of injured employee to seek reimbursement of cost; results of determination may be offered at hearing or conference

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 616C.100  Additional determination of percentage of disability permitted if cost paid by injured employee; authority of injured employee to seek reimbursement of cost; results of determination may be offered at hearing or conference.

      1.  If an injured employee disagrees with the percentage of disability determined by a physician or chiropractic physician, the injured employee may obtain a second determination of the percentage of disability. If the employee wishes to obtain such a determination, the employee must select the physician or chiropractic physician at random from the list of qualified physicians or chiropractic physicians maintained by the Administrator pursuant to subsection 2 of NRS 616C.490. If a second determination is obtained, the injured employee shall pay for the determination. If the physician or chiropractic physician selected to make the second determination finds a higher percentage of disability than the first physician or chiropractic physician, the injured employee may request a hearing officer or appeals officer to order the insurer to reimburse the employee pursuant to the provisions of NRS 616C.330 or 616C.360.

      2.  The results of a second determination made pursuant to subsection 1 may be offered at any hearing or settlement conference.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 2398; A 1993, 736; 1995, 2148; 1999, 1777; 2023, 3622)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2008–2013 · leading case: Law Offices of Barry Levinson, P.C. v. Milko, 184 P.3d 378 (Nev. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Law Offices of Barry Levinson, P.C. v. Milko, 184 P.3d 378 (Nev. 2008). “2 See NRS 616C.100 (establishing the procedure by which a claimant may obtain a second rating determination).”
Ramos v. Mgm Grand Hotel, Llc (Nev. 2013). · cites it 2× “Thus, Ramos's statutory right to request a PPD evaluation under NRS 616C.100 never arose and Dr. Lovaas's PPD evaluation was not warranted.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 616C.100(1) — 1 case
Ramos v. Mgm Grand Hotel, Llc (Nev. 2013). “Thus, Ramos's statutory right to request a PPD evaluation under NRS 616C.100 never arose and Dr. Lovaas's PPD evaluation was not warranted.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.