Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 616C.360 (2026)

Record of hearing before appeals officer; rules of evidence; evaluation of injured employee; submission to independent review organization; powers and duties of appeals officer; transcripts; issuance of decision

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 616C.360  Record of hearing before appeals officer; rules of evidence; evaluation of injured employee; submission to independent review organization; powers and duties of appeals officer; transcripts; issuance of decision.

      1.  A stenographic or electronic record must be kept of the hearing before the appeals officer and the rules of evidence applicable to contested cases under chapter 233B of NRS apply to the hearing.

      2.  The appeals officer must hear any matter raised before him or her on its merits, including new evidence bearing on the matter.

      3.  If there is a medical question or dispute concerning an injured employee’s condition or concerning the necessity of treatment for which authorization for payment has been denied, the appeals officer may:

      (a) Order an independent medical examination and refer the employee to a physician or chiropractic physician of his or her choice who has demonstrated special competence to treat the particular medical condition of the employee, whether or not the physician or chiropractic physician is on the insurer’s panel of providers of health care. If the medical question concerns the rating of a permanent disability, the appeals officer may refer the employee to a rating physician or chiropractic physician. The rating physician or chiropractic physician must be selected at random from the list of qualified physicians or chiropractic physicians maintained by the Administrator pursuant to subsection 2 of NRS 616C.490, unless the insurer and the injured employee otherwise agree to a rating physician or chiropractic physician. The insurer shall pay the costs of any examination requested by the appeals officer.

      (b) If the medical question or dispute is relevant to an issue involved in the matter before the appeals officer and all parties agree to the submission of the matter to an independent review organization, submit the matter to an independent review organization in accordance with NRS 616C.363 and any regulations adopted by the Commissioner.

      4.  The appeals officer may consider the opinion of an examining physician, chiropractic physician, physician assistant or advanced practice registered nurse, in addition to the opinion of an authorized treating physician, chiropractic physician, physician assistant or advanced practice registered nurse, in determining the compensation payable to the injured employee.

      5.  If an injured employee has requested payment for the cost of obtaining a second determination of his or her percentage of disability pursuant to NRS 616C.100, the appeals officer shall decide whether the determination of the higher percentage of disability made pursuant to NRS 616C.100 is appropriate and, if so, may order the insurer to pay to the employee an amount equal to the maximum allowable fee established by the Administrator pursuant to NRS 616C.260 for the type of service performed, or the usual fee of that physician or chiropractic physician for such service, whichever is less.

      6.  The appeals officer shall order an insurer, organization for managed care or employer who provides accident benefits for injured employees pursuant to NRS 616C.265 to pay to the appropriate person the charges of a provider of health care if the conditions of NRS 616C.138 are satisfied.

      7.  Any party to the appeal or contested case or the appeals officer may order a transcript of the record of the hearing at any time before the seventh day after the hearing. The transcript must be filed within 30 days after the date of the order unless the appeals officer otherwise orders.

      8.  Except as otherwise provided in subsection 9, the appeals officer shall render a decision:

      (a) If a transcript is ordered within 7 days after the hearing, within 30 days after the transcript is filed; or

      (b) If a transcript has not been ordered, within 30 days after the date of the hearing.

      9.  The appeals officer shall render a decision on a contested claim submitted pursuant to subsection 2 of NRS 616C.345 within 15 days after:

      (a) The date of the hearing; or

      (b) If the appeals officer orders an independent medical examination, the date the appeals officer receives the report of the examination,

Ê unless both parties to the contested claim agree to a later date.

      10.  The appeals officer may affirm, modify or reverse any decision made by a hearing officer and issue any necessary and proper order to give effect to his or her decision.

      11.  References to a physician assistant and an advanced practice registered nurse in this section are for the purposes of the examination and treatment of an injured employee which are authorized to be provided by a physician assistant or advanced practice registered nurse in the exclusive context of an initial examination and treatment pursuant to NRS 616C.010.

      (Added to NRS by 1979, 1040; A 1987, 92; 1991, 2419; 1993, 740; 1999, 1786, 2219; 2001, 115, 1896; 2003, 2336; 2005, 239, 1269; 2007, 3355; 2009, 1286, 3035; 2011, 3422; 2021, 1192; 2023, 3628)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 2003–2015 · leading case: Dickinson v. Am. Med. Response, 186 P.3d 878 (Nev. 2008).
Dickinson v. Am. Med. Response, 186 P.3d 878 (Nev. 2008). · cites it 2× “25 See NRS 616C.360(2) (providing that the appeals officer must consider any matter raised on its merits); Diaz v.”
Valdez v. Employers Ins. Co. of Nev., 162 P.3d 148 (Nev. 2007). · cites it 2× “055, the insurer is not responsible for any charges for medical treatment or other accident benefits furnished or ordered by any physician . . . selected by the injured employee in disregard of the provisions of this section.”
Law Offices of Barry Levinson, P.C. v. Milko, 184 P.3d 378 (Nev. 2008). “3 See NRS 616C.360(3)(a) (permitting the appeals officer to refer a claimant to a rating physician for an additional disability determination).”
Ayala v. Caesars Palace, 71 P.3d 490 (Nev. 2003). “5426(2) (currently codified as NRS 616C.360(2))). 9 See Glover v. Concerned Citizens for Fuji Park, 118 Nev.”
Hard Rock Hotel & Casino v. Roehl (Nev. 2015). “See NRS 616C.360(4) (appeals officer may consider the opinion of an examining physician).”
Valdez v. Employers Ins. Co. of Nev, 146 P.3d 250 (Nev. 2006). “. selected by the injured employee in disregard of the provisions of this section.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 616C.360(2) — 4 cases
Valdez v. Employers Ins. Co. of Nev., 162 P.3d 148 (Nev. 2007). “055, the insurer is not responsible for any charges for medical treatment or other accident benefits furnished or ordered by any physician . . . selected by the injured employee in disregard of the provisions of this section.”
Dickinson v. Am. Med. Response, 186 P.3d 878 (Nev. 2008). “25 See NRS 616C.360(2) (providing that the appeals officer must consider any matter raised on its merits); Diaz v.”
Ayala v. Caesars Palace, 71 P.3d 490 (Nev. 2003). “5426(2) (currently codified as NRS 616C.360(2))). 9 See Glover v. Concerned Citizens for Fuji Park, 118 Nev.”
Valdez v. Employers Ins. Co. of Nev, 146 P.3d 250 (Nev. 2006). “. selected by the injured employee in disregard of the provisions of this section.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 616C.360(3)(a) — 2 cases
Law Offices of Barry Levinson, P.C. v. Milko, 184 P.3d 378 (Nev. 2008). “3 See NRS 616C.360(3)(a) (permitting the appeals officer to refer a claimant to a rating physician for an additional disability determination).”
Dickinson v. Am. Med. Response, 186 P.3d 878 (Nev. 2008). “25 See NRS 616C.360(2) (providing that the appeals officer must consider any matter raised on its merits); Diaz v.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 616C.360(4) — 1 case
Hard Rock Hotel & Casino v. Roehl (Nev. 2015). “See NRS 616C.360(4) (appeals officer may consider the opinion of an examining physician).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.