Nev. Rev. Stat. § 624.260

Applicant or licensee required to demonstrate experience, knowledge and financial responsibility; qualifications concerning experience and knowledge; limitations on qualifications of natural person

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 624.260  Applicant or licensee required to demonstrate experience, knowledge and financial responsibility; qualifications concerning experience and knowledge; limitations on qualifications of natural person.

      1.  The Board shall require an applicant or licensee to show such a degree of experience, financial responsibility and such general knowledge of the building, safety, health and lien laws of the State of Nevada and the administrative principles of the contracting business as the Board deems necessary for the safety and protection of the public.

      2.  An applicant or licensee may qualify in regard to his or her experience and knowledge in the following ways:

      (a) If a natural person, the applicant or licensee may qualify by personal appearance or by the appearance of his or her responsible managing employee.

      (b) If a copartnership, a corporation or any other combination or organization, it may qualify by the appearance of the responsible managing officer or member of the personnel of the applicant firm.

Ê If an applicant or licensee intends to qualify pursuant to this subsection by the appearance of another person, the applicant or licensee shall submit to the Board such information as the Board determines is necessary to demonstrate the duties and responsibilities of the other person so appearing with respect to the supervision and control of the operations of the applicant or licensee relating to construction.

      3.  The natural person qualifying on behalf of another natural person or firm under paragraphs (a) and (b) of subsection 2 must prove that he or she is a bona fide member or employee of that person or firm and when his or her principal or employer is actively engaged as a contractor shall exercise authority in connection with the principal or employer’s contracting business in the following manner:

      (a) To make technical and administrative decisions;

      (b) To hire, superintend, promote, transfer, lay off, discipline or discharge other employees and to direct them, either by himself or herself or through others, or effectively to recommend such action on behalf of the principal or employer; and

      (c) To devote himself or herself solely to the principal or employer’s business and not to take any other employment which would conflict with his or her duties under this subsection.

      4.  If, pursuant to subsection 2, an applicant or licensee intends to qualify by the appearance of another person, the Board may inquire into and consider any previous business experience of, and any prior and pending lawsuits, liens and judgments against, the other person.

      5.  A natural person may not qualify on behalf of another for more than one active license unless:

      (a) One person owns at least 25 percent of each licensee for which the person qualifies;

      (b) One licensee owns at least 25 percent of the other licensee; or

      (c) One licensee is a corporation for public benefit as defined in NRS 82.021.

      6.  Except as otherwise provided in subsection 7, in addition to the other requirements set forth in this section, each applicant for licensure as a contractor must have had, within the 15 years immediately preceding the filing of the application for licensure, at least 4 years of experience as a journeyman, foreman, supervising employee or contractor in the specific classification in which the applicant is applying for licensure. Training received in a program offered at an accredited college or university or an equivalent program accepted by the Board may be used to satisfy not more than 3 years of experience required pursuant to this subsection.

      7.  If the applicant who is applying for licensure has previously qualified for a contractor’s license in the same classification in which the applicant is applying for licensure, the experience required pursuant to subsection 6 need not be accrued within the 15 years immediately preceding the application.

      8.  As used in this section, “journeyman” means a person who:

      (a) Is fully qualified to perform, without supervision, work in the classification in which the person is applying for licensure; or

      (b) Has successfully completed:

             (1) A program of apprenticeship for the classification in which the person is applying for licensure that has been approved by the State Apprenticeship Council; or

             (2) An equivalent program accepted by the Board.

      [3:Art. IV:186:1941; A 1951, 47]—(NRS A 1967, 1593; 1985, 1056; 1999, 2179; 2015, 2005; 2019, 2032)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases, 1957–2016 · leading case: M.C. Multi-Family Development, L.L.C. v. Crestdale Associates, Ltd.
M.C. Multi-Family Development, L.L.C. v. Crestdale Associates, Ltd. (2008) nev · cites it 3× “In this, MultiFamily Development asserts that, based on NRS 624.260 3 and NRS 624.305, 4 Allsop, even as a qualified employee and share *910 holder of Walter Homes, had no ownership or possessory interest in the corporate contractor’s license and that such a license can only be…”
Royal Indemnity Co. v. Special Service Supply Co. (1966) nev · cites it 2× “” See NRS 624.260. 2 Although the $5,000 limit of the statutory bond seems unrealistic when applied to the construction industry, it is the sum fixed by the legislature and can be changed by the legislature.”
Tsouras v. Southwest Plumbing & Heating (1978) nev · cites it 2× “Appellants suggest that sufficient evidence was produced to show that Smith had actual authority to enter a contract for Southwest Plumbing and Heating because he had been listed by Jones as a “qualifying employee” under NRS 624.260. We disagree. Even if no weight is accorded…”
Simon Service Incorporated v. Mitchell (1957) nev “The purpose of the contractors’ licensing act is evident from NRS 624.260, whereunder the contractors’ board, created by the act, must require an applicant for a contractor’s license “to show such a degree of experience and such general knowledge of the building safety and…”
Interstate Commercial Building Services, Inc. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n (1998) nvd · cites it 2× “See Nev.Rev.Stat. § 624.260 (1997) (contractor applicant to demonstrate experience, knowledge, and financial responsibility); Ne *1174 vada Equities, Inc.”
INTERSTATE COMMERCIAL BLDG. SERV. v. Bank of Amer. (1998) nvd · cites it 2× “See Nev.Rev.Stat. § 624.260 (1997) (contractor applicant to demonstrate experience, knowledge, and financial responsibility); Nevada *1174 Equities, Inc.”
Tom v. Innovative Home Systems (2016) nevapp · cites it 2× “1998) (citing NRS 624.260(1) (1997)2 (requiring applicants "to show such a degree of experience, financial responsibility and such general knowledge .”
Tom v. Innovative Home Systems (2016) nev “[as is] necessary for the safety and protection of the public" in order to obtain a contractor's license)).”
TOM VS. INNOVATIVE HOME SYS., LLC C/W 66006 (2016) nev “[as is] necessary for the safety and protection of the public" in order to obtain a contractor's license)).”
TOM VS. INNOVATIVE HOME SYS., LLC C/W 65419 (2016) nev “[as is] necessary for the safety and protection of the public" in order to obtain a contractor's license)).”
TOM VS. INNOVATIVE HOME SYS., LLC C/W 66006 (2016) nev “[as is] necessary for the safety and protection of the public" in order to obtain a contractor's license)).”
TOM VS. INNOVATIVE HOME SYS., LLC C/W 65419 (2016) nev “[as is] necessary for the safety and protection of the public" in order to obtain a contractor's license)).”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 624.260(1) — 7 cases
Tom v. Innovative Home Systems (2016) nevapp “1998) (citing NRS 624.260(1) (1997)2 (requiring applicants "to show such a degree of experience, financial responsibility and such general knowledge .”
Tom v. Innovative Home Systems (2016) nev “[as is] necessary for the safety and protection of the public" in order to obtain a contractor's license)).”
TOM VS. INNOVATIVE HOME SYS., LLC C/W 66006 (2016) nev “[as is] necessary for the safety and protection of the public" in order to obtain a contractor's license)).”
TOM VS. INNOVATIVE HOME SYS., LLC C/W 65419 (2016) nev “[as is] necessary for the safety and protection of the public" in order to obtain a contractor's license)).”
TOM VS. INNOVATIVE HOME SYS., LLC C/W 66006 (2016) nev “[as is] necessary for the safety and protection of the public" in order to obtain a contractor's license)).”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 624.260(2) — 1 case
M.C. Multi-Family Development, L.L.C. v. Crestdale Associates, Ltd. (2008) nev “In this, MultiFamily Development asserts that, based on NRS 624.260 3 and NRS 624.305, 4 Allsop, even as a qualified employee and share *910 holder of Walter Homes, had no ownership or possessory interest in the corporate contractor’s license and that such a license can only be…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.