Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 62D - PROCEDURE IN JUVENILE PROCEEDINGS

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 62D.010

Manner for conducting proceedings; proceeding open to public; exception

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 62D.010  Manner for conducting proceedings; proceeding open to public; exception.

      1.  Each proceeding conducted pursuant to the provisions of this title:

      (a) Is not criminal in nature.

      (b) Must be heard separately from the trial of cases against adults.

      (c) Must be heard without a jury.

      (d) May be conducted in an informal manner.

      (e) May be held at a facility for the detention of children or elsewhere at the discretion of the juvenile court.

      (f) Does not require stenographic notes or any other transcript of the proceeding unless ordered by the juvenile court.

      2.  Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, each proceeding conducted pursuant to the provisions of this title must be open to the public. If the juvenile court determines that all or part of the proceeding must be closed to the public because the closure is in the best interests of the child or the public:

      (a) The public must be excluded; and

      (b) The juvenile court may order that only those persons who have a direct interest in the case may be admitted. The juvenile court may determine that a victim or any member of the victim’s family is a person who has a direct interest in the case and may be admitted.

      (Added to NRS by 2003, 1057)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2009–2022 · leading case: State v. Javier C.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Javier C. (2012) nev · cites it 2× “, the district court dismissed the charge. Nevada’s Juvenile Justice Code, NRS Title 5, emphasizes that “[a] child who is adjudicated [delinquent] is not a criminal,” NRS 62E.”
Monahan v. Hogan (2022) nevapp “, NRS 62D.010(2) (limiting public access in juvenile proceedings if "in the best interests of the chilcr); NRS 432B.”
State ex rel. A.J. (2009) la “, Rule 10; Ind.Code Ann. § 3 l-32-6-7(a); Ky.Rev.Stat.”
MONAHAN v. HOGAN (CHILD CUSTODY) (2022) nev · cites it 2× “, NRS 62D.010(2) (limiting public access in juvenile proceedings if "in the best interests of the chilcr); NRS 432B.”
Zalyaul v. State (2022) nev “Accordingly, the fact that the district court has jurisdiction over criminal cases does not automatically confer on the district court jurisdiction over delinquent acts once the alleged perpetrator turns 21.”
IN RE: N.J., A MINOR CHILD (2018) nev · cites it 2× “" NRS 62D.010. Consequently, NRS 62D.420 and NRS 48.”
Elizondo (Damian) v. State (2014) nev · cites it 3× “See NRS 62D.010(1). Consequently, the use of juvenile adjudications to provide evidence in a criminal trial—as was SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A cep done here—can allow the admission of evidence that has not been subject to the procedural standards required in a criminal…”
In Re State Ex Rel. AJ (2009) la “§ 571-41(a); Idaho Code § 20-519 , Juv. R., Rule 10; Ind.”
Goode (Amaan) v. State (2014) nev · cites it 2× “See NRS 62D.010(1). Consequently, the use of juvenile adjudications to provide evidence in a criminal trial—as was SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 464.”
IN RE: N.J., A MINOR CHILD (2018) nev “" NRS 62D.010. Consequently, NRS 62D.420 and NRS 48.”
N.J. v. State (In re N.J.) (2018) nev “" NRS 62D.010. Consequently, NRS 62D.420 and NRS 48.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 62D.010(1) — 2 cases
Elizondo (Damian) v. State (2014) nev “See NRS 62D.010(1). Consequently, the use of juvenile adjudications to provide evidence in a criminal trial—as was SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A cep done here—can allow the admission of evidence that has not been subject to the procedural standards required in a criminal…”
Goode (Amaan) v. State (2014) nev “See NRS 62D.010(1). Consequently, the use of juvenile adjudications to provide evidence in a criminal trial—as was SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 464.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 62D.010(1)(a) — 3 cases
Zalyaul v. State (2022) nev “Accordingly, the fact that the district court has jurisdiction over criminal cases does not automatically confer on the district court jurisdiction over delinquent acts once the alleged perpetrator turns 21.”
Elizondo (Damian) v. State (2014) nev “See NRS 62D.010(1). Consequently, the use of juvenile adjudications to provide evidence in a criminal trial—as was SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A cep done here—can allow the admission of evidence that has not been subject to the procedural standards required in a criminal…”
Goode (Amaan) v. State (2014) nev “See NRS 62D.010(1). Consequently, the use of juvenile adjudications to provide evidence in a criminal trial—as was SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 464.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 62D.010(1)(c) — 1 case
In Re State Ex Rel. AJ (2009) la “§ 571-41(a); Idaho Code § 20-519 , Juv. R., Rule 10; Ind.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 62D.010(2) — 2 cases
Monahan v. Hogan (2022) nevapp “, NRS 62D.010(2) (limiting public access in juvenile proceedings if "in the best interests of the chilcr); NRS 432B.”
MONAHAN v. HOGAN (CHILD CUSTODY) (2022) nev “, NRS 62D.010(2) (limiting public access in juvenile proceedings if "in the best interests of the chilcr); NRS 432B.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 62D.010(l)(a) — 1 case
State v. Javier C. (2012) nev “, the district court dismissed the charge. Nevada’s Juvenile Justice Code, NRS Title 5, emphasizes that “[a] child who is adjudicated [delinquent] is not a criminal,” NRS 62E.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 62D.010(l)(c) — 1 case
State ex rel. A.J. (2009) la “, Rule 10; Ind.Code Ann. § 3 l-32-6-7(a); Ky.Rev.Stat.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.