Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 62D - PROCEDURE IN JUVENILE PROCEEDINGS
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 62D.190 (2026)

Child determined to be incompetent may not be adjudicated delinquent or in need of supervision, placed under supervision of juvenile court or committed to custody of correctional facility during period that child remains incompetent; sealing of records

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 62D.190  Child determined to be incompetent may not be adjudicated delinquent or in need of supervision, placed under supervision of juvenile court or committed to custody of correctional facility during period that child remains incompetent; sealing of records.  

      1.  If the juvenile court determines that a child is incompetent pursuant to NRS 62D.180, during the period that the child remains incompetent, the child may not be:

      (a) Adjudicated a delinquent child or a child in need of supervision;

      (b) Placed under the supervision of the juvenile court pursuant to a supervision and consent decree pursuant to NRS 62C.230; or

      (c) Committed to the custody of a correctional facility.

      2.  If the juvenile court determines that a child is incompetent and unable to attain competence in the foreseeable future pursuant to subsection 3 of NRS 62D.185, the child may petition to have his or her records sealed pursuant to NRS 62H.130.

      (Added to NRS by 2015, 2033; A 2021, 2555)

PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING INDIAN CHILDREN

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2024–2024 · leading case: In re D.C., Jr., 140 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 25 (Nev. 2024).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re D.C., Jr., 140 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 25 (Nev. 2024). · cites it 2× “And because the juvenile court did not assess his competency to stand trial but instead only found him competent to participate in juvenile court proceedings, D.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 62D.190(1) — 1 case
In re D.C., Jr., 140 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 25 (Nev. 2024). “And because the juvenile court did not assess his competency to stand trial but instead only found him competent to participate in juvenile court proceedings, D.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.