NRS
62E.010 Adjudication is not conviction and does not impose civil
disabilities; exceptions.
1. A child who is adjudicated pursuant to
the provisions of this title is not a criminal and any adjudication is not a
conviction, and a child may be charged with a crime or convicted in a criminal
proceeding only as provided in this title.
2. Except as otherwise provided by
specific statute, an adjudication pursuant to the provisions of this title upon
the status of a child does not impose any of the civil disabilities ordinarily
resulting from conviction, and the disposition of a child or any evidence given
in the juvenile court must not be used to disqualify the child in any future
application for or appointment to the civil service.
(Added to NRS by 2003,
1062)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
4
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 2012–2022 · leading case:
State v. Javier C., 289 P.3d 1194 (Nev. 2012).
State v. Javier C., 289 P.3d 1194 (Nev. 2012).
· cites it 2× “481(2)(f), a category B felony. On motion by Javier C.”
Zalyaul v. State, 520 P.3d 345 (Nev. 2022).
“Accordingly, the fact that the district court has jurisdiction over criminal cases does not automatically confer on the district court jurisdiction over delinquent acts once the alleged perpetrator turns 21.”
State v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct. (Logan D.), No. 52477 (Nev. July 25, 2013).
“579 subjects juvenile sex offenders to registration and community notification does not eliminate the many differences between the juvenile and adult justice systems. For example, juvenile sex offenders are not "convicted," cannot be sentenced to prison, and are not subject to…”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 62E.010(1): 2 cases
State v. Javier C., 289 P.3d 1194 (Nev. 2012).
“481(2)(f), a category B felony. On motion by Javier C.”
Zalyaul v. State, 520 P.3d 345 (Nev. 2022).
“Accordingly, the fact that the district court has jurisdiction over criminal cases does not automatically confer on the district court jurisdiction over delinquent acts once the alleged perpetrator turns 21.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.