NRS
630.311 Review and investigation of complaint by committee designated by
Board; formal charging document; proceedings confidential; publication of
summary of proceedings and determinations.
1. Except as otherwise provided in NRS 630.323, a committee designated by the
Board and consisting of members of the Board shall review each complaint
received by the Board that is within the jurisdiction of the Board and conduct
an investigation to determine if there is a reasonable basis for the complaint.
The committee must be composed of at least three members of the Board, at least
one of whom is not a physician. The committee may issue orders to aid its
investigation including, but not limited to, compelling a physician to appear
before the committee.
2. If, after conducting an investigation,
the committee determines that there is a reasonable basis for the complaint and
that a violation of any provision of this chapter has occurred, the committee
may file a formal charging document with the Board.
3. The proceedings of the committee are
confidential and are not subject to the requirements of NRS 241.020. Within 20 days after the
conclusion of each meeting of the committee, the Board shall publish a summary
setting forth the proceedings and determinations of the committee. The summary
must not identify any person involved in the complaint that is the subject of
the proceedings.
(Added to NRS by 1977,
824; A 1983,
306; 1985,
2239; 1987,
200; 1993,
2302; 2009,
2966; 2017,
4412; 2025,
1623)
Notes of Decisions
SARFO VS. STATE, BD. OF MED EXAM'RS (2018)
nev · cites it 10×
“See NRS 630.311. Upon receipt of the initial complaint filed by a member of the public against a physician, the Board must designate an IC to "review each complaint and conduct an investigation to determine if there is a reasonable basis for the complaint.”
SARFO VS. STATE, BD. OF MED EXAM'RS (2018)
nev · cites it 10×
“See NRS 630.311. Upon receipt of the initial complaint filed by a member of the public against a physician, the Board must designate an IC to "review each complaint and conduct an investigation to determine if there is a reasonable basis for the complaint.”
Sarfo v. State (2018)
nev · cites it 5×
“See NRS 630.311. Upon receipt of the initial complaint *653 filed by a member of the public against a physician, the Board must designate an IC to "review each complaint and conduct an investigation to determine if there is a reasonable basis for the complaint.”
Sarfo v. State, Bd. of Med Exam'rs (2018)
nev · cites it 4×
“See NRS 630.311. Upon receipt of the initial complaint filed by a member of the public against a physician, the Board must designate an IC to "review each complaint and conduct an investigation to determine if there is a reasonable basis for the complaint.”
Kevin Buckwalter v. State of Nevada Board (2012)
ca9
“See Nev. Rev. Stat. § 630.311 . If the investigation substantiates the complaint, the Board may bring formal charges against the physician and set a hearing date.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 630.311(1) — 4 cases
SARFO VS. STATE, BD. OF MED EXAM'RS (2018)
nev
“See NRS 630.311. Upon receipt of the initial complaint filed by a member of the public against a physician, the Board must designate an IC to "review each complaint and conduct an investigation to determine if there is a reasonable basis for the complaint.”
SARFO VS. STATE, BD. OF MED EXAM'RS (2018)
nev
“See NRS 630.311. Upon receipt of the initial complaint filed by a member of the public against a physician, the Board must designate an IC to "review each complaint and conduct an investigation to determine if there is a reasonable basis for the complaint.”
Sarfo v. State (2018)
nev
“See NRS 630.311. Upon receipt of the initial complaint *653 filed by a member of the public against a physician, the Board must designate an IC to "review each complaint and conduct an investigation to determine if there is a reasonable basis for the complaint.”
Sarfo v. State, Bd. of Med Exam'rs (2018)
nev
“See NRS 630.311. Upon receipt of the initial complaint filed by a member of the public against a physician, the Board must designate an IC to "review each complaint and conduct an investigation to determine if there is a reasonable basis for the complaint.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 630.311(2) — 4 cases
SARFO VS. STATE, BD. OF MED EXAM'RS (2018)
nev
“See NRS 630.311. Upon receipt of the initial complaint filed by a member of the public against a physician, the Board must designate an IC to "review each complaint and conduct an investigation to determine if there is a reasonable basis for the complaint.”
SARFO VS. STATE, BD. OF MED EXAM'RS (2018)
nev
“See NRS 630.311. Upon receipt of the initial complaint filed by a member of the public against a physician, the Board must designate an IC to "review each complaint and conduct an investigation to determine if there is a reasonable basis for the complaint.”
Sarfo v. State, Bd. of Med Exam'rs (2018)
nev
“See NRS 630.311. Upon receipt of the initial complaint filed by a member of the public against a physician, the Board must designate an IC to "review each complaint and conduct an investigation to determine if there is a reasonable basis for the complaint.”
Sarfo v. State (2018)
nev
“See NRS 630.311. Upon receipt of the initial complaint *653 filed by a member of the public against a physician, the Board must designate an IC to "review each complaint and conduct an investigation to determine if there is a reasonable basis for the complaint.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.