Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 686A - TRADE PRACTICES AND FRAUDS; FINANCING OF PREMIUMS
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 686A.260 (2026)

Revocation or suspension of license for violation of laws of other state

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 686A.260  Revocation or suspension of license for violation of laws of other state.  The Commissioner may revoke or suspend the license of any person domiciled or resident in Nevada and licensed to transact insurance in Nevada as insurer, agent, broker or otherwise, upon a hearing and proof that such person, as the result of a hearing before the commissioner, director or superintendent of insurance or insurance department of another state, or in a judicial proceeding in another state, has been found to have violated the insurance laws of that state relating to unfair methods of competition or unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of the business of insurance, and as a result thereof either has had his or her license revoked or suspended in that state or has been found guilty of failing to comply with any order, decree or judgment issued pursuant to such hearing or judicial proceeding in that state.

      (Added to NRS by 1971, 1697)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2021–2021 · leading case: My Left Foot Child.'s Therapy, LLC v. Certain Underwriter's at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy No. HAH15-0632, No. 2:15-cv-01746 (D. Nev. Mar. 22, 2021).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
My Left Foot Child.'s Therapy, LLC v. Certain Underwriter's at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy No. HAH15-0632, No. 2:15-cv-01746 (D. Nev. Mar. 22, 2021). · cites it 4× “For example, while some sections within 6 the chapter refer to “guilt” in reference to criminal penalties,10 Nev. Rev. Stat. § 686A.260 7 relating to the revocation or suspension of a license uses the phrase “found guilty” in the 8 context of civil penalties.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.