Nev. Rev. Stat. § 686A.315

Statements required with certain billing and claim forms submitted to insurers; failure to provide statements not defense in prosecution for insurance fraud

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 686A.315  Statements required with certain billing and claim forms submitted to insurers; failure to provide statements not defense in prosecution for insurance fraud.

      1.  If a hospital submits to an insurer the form prescribed by the Director of the Nevada Health Authority pursuant to NRS 449.485, that form must contain or be accompanied by a statement that reads substantially as follows:

 

       Any person who misrepresents or falsifies essential information requested on this form may, upon conviction, be subject to a fine and imprisonment under state or federal law, or both.

 

      2.  If a person who is licensed to practice one of the health professions regulated by title 54 of NRS submits to an insurer the form commonly referred to as the “HCFA-1500” for a patient who is not covered by any governmental program which offers insurance coverage for health care, the form must be accompanied by a statement that reads substantially as follows:

 

       Any person who knowingly files a statement of claim containing any misrepresentation or any false, incomplete or misleading information may be guilty of a criminal act punishable under state or federal law, or both, and may be subject to civil penalties.

 

      3.  The failure to provide any of the statements required by this section is not a defense in a prosecution for insurance fraud pursuant to NRS 686A.291.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 1042; A 1991, 1978; 2001, 1099; 2007, 661; 2021, 1646; 2025, 3764)

     

Notes of Decisions
My Left Foot Children's Therapy, LLC v. Certain Underwriter's at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy No. HAH15-0632 (2021) nvd · cites it 2× “”); Nev. Rev. Stat. § 686A.315 (“. . . may be guilty of a criminal act punishable under state or federal law.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.