Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 706 - MOTOR CARRIERS

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 706.311

Motor carriers and operators of tow cars required to provide reasonably adequate service and facilities; charges required to be just and reasonable; unjust and unreasonable charges unlawful

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 706.311  Motor carriers and operators of tow cars required to provide reasonably adequate service and facilities; charges required to be just and reasonable; unjust and unreasonable charges unlawful.

      1.  Except as otherwise provided in subsection 2, every common and contract motor carrier is required to furnish reasonably adequate service and facilities, and all transportation charges made by any such carrier must be just and reasonable.

      2.  Every operator of a tow car is required to furnish reasonably adequate service and facilities, and all charges assessed for towing services performed without the prior consent of the owner of the vehicle or the person authorized by the owner to operate the vehicle must be just and reasonable.

      3.  Every unjust and unreasonable charge for service by any such carrier or operator of a tow car is prohibited and shall be deemed to be unlawful.

      (Added to NRS by 1971, 696; A 1997, 2672)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1993–2021 · leading case: Delta Traffic Service, Inc. v. Las Vegas Fertilizer Co.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Delta Traffic Service, Inc. v. Las Vegas Fertilizer Co. (1993) nev “Especially relevant to our inquiry are NRS 706.311 through 706.781. For example, NRS 706.”
A&A Towing, Inc. v. Nevada Transportation Authority (2021) nvd · cites it 2× “At its 8 March 2017 General Session Meeting, the NTA determined the “service fee” was “just and 9 reasonable” pursuant to NRS 706.311. ECF No. 19-2. Finally, at the April 2017 General Session 10 Meeting, the NTA amended the Model Tow Tariff to include the “service fee.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.