Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 719 - ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS (UNIFORM ACT)

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 719.260

Attribution and effect of electronic record and electronic signature

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 719.260  Attribution and effect of electronic record and electronic signature.

      1.  An electronic record or electronic signature is attributable to a person if it was the act of the person. The act of the person may be shown in any manner, including a showing of the efficacy of any security procedure applied to determine the person to whom the electronic record or electronic signature was attributable.

      2.  The effect of an electronic record or electronic signature attributed to a person under subsection 1 is determined from the context and surrounding circumstances at the time of its creation, execution or adoption, including the parties’ agreement, if any, and otherwise as provided by law.

      (Added to NRS by 2001, 2717)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2021–2025 · leading case: Jenkins-Naudain v. ABM Industries Inc.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Jenkins-Naudain v. ABM Industries Inc. (2023) nvd · cites it 2× “”); 4 Nev. Rev. Stat. § 719.260 (“An electronic record or electronic signature is attributable to a person 5 if it was the act of the person.”
Alejandro Romero v. Watkins & Shepard Trucking Inc (2021) ca9 “…class="citation no-link">Cal. Civ. Code § 1633.9 (a); Nev. Rev. Stat. § 719.260 (1). When Romero logged onto Watkins’ online portal and clicked “I Agree” to the Arbitration Policy, he affirmed that his response was “true and accurate” and would “constitute [his] electronic…”
Mitchell v. Veterans Alliance, LLC (2025) nvd “§ 719.260(1)). 1 Courts have compelled arbitration where the declarations provided detailed 2 information explaining how the employee signed an arbitration agreement and 3 how defendant can ascertain that the signature was an act of the plaintiff’s.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 719.260(1) — 1 case
Mitchell v. Veterans Alliance, LLC (2025) nvd “§ 719.260(1)). 1 Courts have compelled arbitration where the declarations provided detailed 2 information explaining how the employee signed an arbitration agreement and 3 how defendant can ascertain that the signature was an act of the plaintiff’s.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.