Nev. Rev. Stat. § 97B.100
Consumer form contracts: Enforceability of choice of law and forum selection provisions
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 97B.100 Consumer form contracts: Enforceability of choice of law and
forum selection provisions. If a
consumer form contract is signed by the consumer or otherwise formed while the
consumer resides in this State with a person operating within this State:
1. A choice of law provision in a consumer form contract which provides that the consumer form contract is to be governed or interpreted pursuant to the laws of another state is void. Enforcement and interpretation of such a contract must be governed by the laws of this State if enforcement of the consumer form contract is sought in a court of this State.
2. A forum selection provision in a consumer form contract which provides that any claims or actions related to the consumer form contract must be litigated in a forum outside this State is void.
(Added to NRS by 2019, 2309)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case (1 in the last 5 years), 2021–2021 · leading case: Watkins v. Rapid Financial Solutions, Inc.
Watkins v. Rapid Financial Solutions, Inc. (2021)
“) Moreover, pursuant to NRS § 97B.100(1), “[a] choice of law provision in a consumer form contract which provides that the consumer form contract is to be 26 governed or interpreted pursuant to the laws of another state is void.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 97B.100(1) — 1 case
Watkins v. Rapid Financial Solutions, Inc. (2021)
“) Moreover, pursuant to NRS § 97B.100(1), “[a] choice of law provision in a consumer form contract which provides that the consumer form contract is to be 26 governed or interpreted pursuant to the laws of another state is void.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.